skip to main content
10.1145/1068009.1068295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Probing for limits to building block mixing with a tunably-difficult problem for genetic programming

Published:25 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a tunably-difficult problem for genetic programming (GP) that probes for limits to building block mixing and assembly. The existence of such a problem can be used to garner insight into the dynamics of what happens during the course of a GP run. The results indicate that the amount of mixing is fairly low in comparison to the amount of content that could be present in an initial population.

References

  1. Banzhaf, W., et al. GP: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daida, J.M. Limits to Expression in Genetic Programming: Lattice-Aggregate Modeling. in CEC 2002, IEEE, Piscataway, 2002, 273--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Daida, J.M. Towards Identifying Populations that Increase the Likelihood of Success in Genetic Programming. in GECCO 2005, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daida, J.M. What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? A Look at How Structure Affects Content. in Riolo, R.L. and Worzel, W. eds. GP Theory and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003, 99--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Daida, J.M., Bertram, R.B., Polito 2, J.A. and Stanhope, S.A. Analysis of Single-Node (Building) Blocks in GP. in Spector, L., et al. eds. Advances in GP 3, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999, 217--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Daida, J.M. and Hilss, A.M. Identifying Structural Mechanisms in Standard GP. in Cantú-Paz, et al. eds. GECCO 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, 1639--1651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daida, J.M., et al. What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? Validating a Hypothesis of Structural Causes. in Cantú-Paz, et al. eds. GECCO 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, 1665--1677. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Daida, J.M., et al. What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? Analysis of a Tunably Difficult Problem in GP. in Banzhaf, W., et al. eds. GECCO '99, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999, 982 -- 989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Daida, J.M., et al. What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? Analysis of a Tunably Difficult Problem in GP. GPEM, 2 (2). 165--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gathercole, C. and Ross, P. An Adverse Interaction Between Crossover and Restricted Tree Depth in GP. in Koza, J.R., et al. eds. GP 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, 291--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goldberg, D.E. and O'Reilly, U.-M. Where Does the Good Stuff Go, and Why? in Banzhaf, W., et al. eds. EuroGP, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, 16--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hall, J.M. and Soule, T. Does GP Inherently Adopt Structured Design Techniques? in O'Reilly, U.-M., et al. eds. GP Theory and Practice II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Langdon, W.B. and Poli, R. An Analysis of the MAX Problem in Genetic Programming. in Koza, J.R., et al. eds. GP 1997, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1997, 222--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Langdon, W.B. and Poli, R. Foundations of GP. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsumoto, M. and Nishimura, T. Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed Uniform Pseudorandom Number Generator. ACM Trans Mod and Comp Sim, 8 (1). 3--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. McPhee, N.F. and Hopper, N.J. Analysis of Genetic Diversity through Population History. in Banzhaf, W., et al. eds. GECCO '99, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1999, 1112 -- 1120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Motoki, T. Calculating the Expected Loss of Diversity of Selection Schemes. EC, 10 (4). 397--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. O'Reilly, U.-M. The Impact of External Dependency in GP Primitives. in CEC 1999, IEEE Press, Piscataway, 1998, 306--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. O'Reilly, U.-M. and Goldberg, D.E. How Fitness Structure Affects Subsolution Acquisition in GP. in Koza, J.R., et al. eds. GP 1998, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998, 269--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Poli, R. General Schema Theory for GP with Subtree-Swapping Crossover. in Miller, J.F., et al. eds. EuroGP 2001, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, 143--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Punch, W., et al. The Royal Tree Problem, A Benchmark for Single and Multiple Population GP. in Angeline, P.J. and K.E. Kinnear, J. eds. Advances in GP, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, 299--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rosca, J.P. Analysis of Complexity Drift in GP. in Koza, J.R., et al. eds. GP 1997, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1997, 286--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sastry, K., et al. Population Sizing for GP Based on Decision Making. in O'Reilly, U.-M., et al. eds. GP Theory and Practice II, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2004, 49--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Soule, T., et al. Code Growth in Genetic Programming. in Koza, J.R., et al. eds. GP 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1996, 215 -- 223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zongker, D. and Punch, W. lilgp, Michigan State University Genetic Algorithms Research and Applications Group, Lansing, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '05: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
    June 2005
    2272 pages
    ISBN:1595930108
    DOI:10.1145/1068009

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 June 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    GECCO '24
    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 14 - 18, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader