skip to main content
10.1145/3071178.3071286acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards the evolution of multi-layered neural networks: a dynamic structured grammatical evolution approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current grammar-based NeuroEvolution approaches have several shortcomings. On the one hand, they do not allow the generation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) composed of more than one hidden-layer. On the other, there is no way to evolve networks with more than one output neuron. To properly evolve ANNs with more than one hidden-layer and multiple output nodes there is the need to know the number of neurons available in previous layers. In this paper we introduce Dynamic Structured Grammatical Evolution (DSGE): a new genotypic representation that overcomes the aforementioned limitations. By enabling the creation of dynamic rules that specify the connection possibilities of each neuron, the methodology enables the evolution of multi-layered ANNs with more than one output neuron. Results in different classification problems show that DSGE evolves effective single and multi-layered ANNs, with a varying number of output neurons.

References

  1. Fardin Ahmadizar, Khabat Soltanian, Fardin AkhlaghianTab, and Ioannis Tsoulos. 2015. Artificial neural network development by means of a novel combination of grammatical evolution and genetic algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 39 (2015), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Filipe Assuncao, Nuno Lourenco, Penousal Machado, and Bernardete Ribeiro. 2017. Automatic Generation of Neural Networks with Structured Grammatical Evolution. In 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Omid E David and Iddo Greental. 2014. Genetic algorithms for evolving deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conf. companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation companion. ACM, 1451-1452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lucian-Ovidiu Fedorovici, Radu-Emil Precup, Florin Dragan, and Constantin Purcaru. 2013. Evolutionary optimization-based training of convolutional neural networks for OCR applications. In System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), 2013 17th International Conf. IEEE, 207-212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Limin Fu and Enzo Medico. 2007. FLAME, a novel fuzzy clustering method for the analysis of DNA microarray data. BMC bioinformatics 8, 1 (2007), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Faustino Gomez, Jürgen Schmidhuber, and Risto Miikkulainen. 2008. Accelerated neural evolution through cooperatively coevolved synapses. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, May (2008), 937-965. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Paul Gorman and Terrence J. Sejnowski. 1988. Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets. Neural networks 1, 1 (1988), 75-89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Frederic Gruau. 1992. Genetic synthesis of boolean neural networks with a cell rewriting developmental process. In International Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks, COGANN-92. IEEE, 55-74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jae-Yoon Jung and James A Reggia. 2006. Evolutionary design of neural network architectures using a descriptive encoding language. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation 10, 6 (2006), 676-688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Lichman. 2013. UCI ML Repository. (2013). archive.ics.uci.edu/mlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nuno Lourenco, Francisco B. Pereira, and Ernesto Costa. 2016. Unveiling the properties of structured grammatical evolution. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines (2016), 1-39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Miguel Rocha, Paulo Cortez, and José Neves. 2007. Evolution of neural networks for classification and regression. Neurocomputing 70, 16 (2007), 2809-2816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Conor Ryan, JJ Collins, and Michael O'Neill. 1998. Grammatical evolution: Evolving programs for an arbitrary language. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 83-96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tapas Si, Arunava De, and Anup Kumar Bhattacharjee. 2014. Grammatical Swarm for Artificial Neural Network Training. In International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT). IEEE, 1657-1661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vincent G. Sigillito, Simon P. Wing, Larrie V. Hutton, and Kile B. Baker. 1989. Classification of radar returns from the ionosphere using neural networks. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest 10, 3 (1989), 262-266.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Khabat Soltanian, Fardin Akhlaghian Tab, Fardin Ahmadi Zar, and Ioannis Tsoulos. 2013. Artificial neural networks generation using grammatical evolution. In 21st Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). IEEE, 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kenneth O Stanley and Risto Miikkulainen. 2002. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary computation 10, 2 (2002), 99-127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Nick Street, William H. Wolberg, and Olvi L. Mangasarian. 1993. Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. In IS&T/SPIE's Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 861-870.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sreenivas Sremath Tirumala, S Ali, and C Phani Ramesh. 2016. Evolving deep neural networks: A new prospect. In Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD), 2016 12th International Conf. on. IEEE, 69-74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ioannis Tsoulos, Dimitris Gavrilis, and Euripidis Glavas. 2008. Neural network construction and training using grammatical evolution. Neurocomputing 72, 1 (2008), 269-277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Darrell Whitley, Timothy Starkweather, and Christopher Bogart. 1990. Genetic algorithms and neural networks: Optimizing connections and connectivity. Parallel computing 14, 3 (1990), 347-361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 2017
    1427 pages
    ISBN:9781450349208
    DOI:10.1145/3071178

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 July 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    GECCO '17 Paper Acceptance Rate178of462submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    GECCO '24
    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 14 - 18, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader