Elsevier

Journal of Molecular Liquids

Volume 224, Part B, December 2016, Pages 1117-1123
Journal of Molecular Liquids

Phase stability conditions of clathrate hydrates for methane + aqueous solution of water soluble organic promoter system: Modeling using a thermodynamic framework

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.084Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The considering systems were methane + water + water-soluble organic promoter.

  • A correlation was presented to estimate the hydrate phase boundary of this system.

  • This correlation calculates the enthalpy of hydrate dissociation.

Abstract

A thermodynamic model is presented for predicting the phase stability conditions of clathrate hydrates for methane + water-soluble organic promoter aqueous solution. A new equation is then proposed to estimate the enthalpy of hydrate dissociation for methane + aqueous solution of water-soluble organic promoter using Genetic Programming (GP) and Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) evolutionary algorithm. The model reliably predicts the hydrate dissociation conditions for methane + aqueous solutions of tetrahydrofuran, 1,3-dioxolane, 1,4-dioxane and acetone. The van Laar model is used to calculate the activity coefficient of water in aqueous solution of water-soluble organic promoter. About 30% of the reported experimental data were used for finding the empirical relationships to estimate the enthalpy of hydrate dissociation and the remaining 70% was used to test the accuracy and the predictive capability of the correlation. The average absolute error for methane hydrate dissociation temperatures was found to be 0.33 K, which indicates the accuracy of the model.

Introduction

Gas hydrates, or clathrate hydrates, are crystalline compounds formed through the combination of water and suitably sized molecules, which are generally gases and some volatile liquids. This compound has a lattice structure formed as the result of the hydrogen bonds of water molecules that create cavities in the form of lattice. This structure, known as empty lattice hydrate, is unstable, however, can become stable at appropriate temperatures and pressures in the presence of various components of suitable size and shape. There is no chemical bond formed between the water and guest molecules trapped in this crystal structure. The stabilization of the crystals is as the result of creation of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the van der Waals forces [1], [2]. Examples of these types of molecules are natural gases components such as methane, ethane, propane and carbon dioxide.

Humphrey Davy originally discovered gas hydrates in 1810. They can occur in three typical types of structures: I, II and H depending generally on the guest molecules [1]. Gas hydrates rather than caused pipelines occlusion [2], have not always been considered as an undesirable end product. Indeed, this phenomenon may have many industrial applications. Gas hydrates have been utilized to separate mixtures of gases [3] and carbon dioxide from flue/fuel gas [4], desalinate seawater [5], [6], as well as the storage and transportation of natural gases [7]. Given the importance of gas hydrate formation, some methods have been used to expedite its production. Variety of chemicals as promoters has also been used to improve structural stability and gas storage capacity.

Today, two types of promoters are generally used: kinetic promoters and thermodynamic promoters. Kinetic promoters can reduce the hydrates formation time, increase gas storage, and increase the stability of the hydrate produced at ambient condition [8], [9], [10], [11]. Thermodynamic promoters enhance the conditions for gas hydrate formation to low pressures and high temperatures. A group of the latter promoters include water-soluble organic promoters generally forming type II structure. This is partly due to the molecular size of the water-soluble organic promoter. These molecules naturally do not have the capacity to occupy the small cavities of structure II and they normally occupy the larger cavities of structure II and acquire stability. Representatives of water-soluble organic promoters are tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,3-dioxolane, 1,4-dioxane and acetone [12], [13], [14], [15]. Approximately, six mole percent of these promoters increase the dissociation temperature of methane hydrate and then, at higher concentrations and due to the decreasing of water activity, this effect slowly cools off [12], [13], [14], [15], [16].

Hydrate dissociation/equilibrium conditions for methane + aqueous solution of acetone system have been extensively studied by Mainush et al. [12]; Ng and Robinson [14] and Seo et al. [15]; and for methane + 1.4-dioxane + water system by Jager et al. [13] and Seo et al. [15], for methane + 1.3-dioxolane + water system by De Deuged et al. [16], and for methane + tetrahydrofuran + water system by De deuged et al. [16], Seo et al. [15], Zhang et al. [17] and Mohammadi and Richon [18].

Mainusch et al. [12] measured hydrate dissociation conditions for methane + acetone + water system. The data were described by a model that took into account the variation of the enthalpy of hydrate dissociation as a function of pressure and acetone concentration. The model for this system could well predict hydrate dissociation temperature [12]. Later, Jagger et al. [13] used the van der Waals-Platteeuw solid solution theory and assumed the occupancy of the large cavities of structure II by 1,4-dioxane to predict temperatures of methane hydrate dissociation in the presence of 1,4-dioxane aqueous solution and concluded that the model cannot predict methane hydrate dissociation in concentrations up to 20 mol% of 1,4-dioxane [13]. De Deuged et al. [16] used the van der Waals-Platteeuw solid solution theory to predict hydrate dissociation temperatures for methane + acetone, 1,4-dioxane, 1,3-doxolane or tetrahydrofuran + water system. They also compared the promoting property of these promoters and found that the promoting property was in the order of tetrahydrofuran > 1.3-dioxolane > 1.4-dioxane > acetone [16]. Seo et al. [15] used the van der Waals-Platteeuw solid solution theory, SRK equation of state and UNIFAC activity model to predict hydrate dissociation temperatures in methane/nitrogen + 1.4-dioxane/tetrahydrofuran/acetone/propylene oxide + water system with acceptable results [15]. Using the model established by Jager et al. [13], Javanmardi et al. [19] proposed a model to predict hydrate dissociation temperatures in methane + acetone + water system [19]. Mohammadi and coworkers could well represent/predict hydrate dissociation temperature of methane, carbon dioxide or nitrogen + tetrahydrofuran + water system using an artificial neural network algorithm [20]. Pahlavanzadeh et al. [21] suggested a thermodynamic model to predict the hydrate dissociation temperatures of methane/hydrogen/carbon dioxide + tetrahydrofuran + water system and achieved satisfactory results from the model [21].

To the best of our knowledge, no method has been proposed for using enthalpy of dissociation to predict hydrate dissociation conditions in the presence of various types of water-soluble organic promoters. In this study, Genetic Programming (GP) and Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) evolutionary algorithms were used to develop a simple formula to estimate the enthalpy of hydrate dissociation in methane + water-soluble organic promoter + water system, including acetone, 1,3-dioxolane, 1,4-dioxane, and tetrahydrofuran. Finally, the results are compared with the reported experimental data and satisfactory accuracies are observed.

Section snippets

Thermodynamic model

To calculate the hydrate dissociation temperature in the presence of aqueous solution of an additive, Eq. (1), originally proposed by Pieroen [22], can be used. This approach was originally applied by Mainusch et al. [12] for the systems containing acetone and by Maddox et al. [23], Javanmardi et al., and Ghiasi and Mohammadi [24] for the systems containing alcohols and electrolytes.lnaw=ΔHNR1T1Twwhere, Tw represents the dissociation temperature of methane hydrate in the presence of pure

Results and discussion

Gas hydrate dissociation conditions in the presence of water soluble organic promoters depend on the size and polarity of these compounds. The number of atoms in a ring, the number of oxygen atoms of promoter and the molecular weight of promoter define the size of promoter. Moreover, the dipole moments of promoter may be used for determining the polarity of promoters.

The molecules of water-soluble organic promoter do not have hydrogen bonds at normal conditions, but when dissolved in water,

Conclusions

A reliable method for prediction of hydrate dissociation conditions for methane + aqueous solution of water-soluble organic promoter is presented. The GP and TLBO algorithms were used to develop a correlation for calculation of enthalpy of hydrate dissociation for methane + aqueous solution of water-soluble organic promoter. The parameters of this correlation were optimized and reported. The studied additives are tetrahydrofuran, 1,3-dioxolane, 1,4-dioxane and acetone. The van Laar and NRTL

Nomenclature

    a

    Kihara potential parameter, spherical potential hard core radius Ao

    b

    heat capacity temperature dependency (J/mol·K2)

    aw

    water activity

    Aij

    binary parameters of van Laar

    Cmj

    Langmuir constant of type j hydrate former in type m cavity (kPa 1)

    ΔCpw0

    reference heat capacity difference (J/mol·K)

    ΔCpwl

    different specific heat capacity

    d

    the donor of hydrogen bond of promoter

    f

    fugacity (kPa)

    Gij

    energy interaction parameters in the Boltzmann from in the NRTL model

    Δhw0

    reference difference (J/mol)

    Δhwl

    enthalpy

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge gratefully the financial support of Shiraz University of Technology.

References (39)

  • I.F. Makogon

    Hydrates of hydrocarbons

  • V.K.K. Verma et al.

    Denuding hydrocarbon liquids of natural gas constituents by hydrate formation

    J. Pet. Technol.

    (1975)
  • S.-P. Kang et al.

    Recovery of CO2 from flue gas using gas hydrate: thermodynamic verification through phase equilibrium measurements

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2000)
  • W.G. Knox et al.

    The hydrate process

    Chem. Eng. Prog.

    (1961)
  • U. Karaaslan et al.

    Surfactants as hydrate promoters?

    Energy Fuel

    (2000)
  • N. Kalogerakis et al.

    Effect of surfactants on hydrate formation kinetics

  • S. Mainusch et al.

    Experimental determination and modeling of methane hydrates in mixtures of acetone and water

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (1997)
  • H. NG et al.

    New developments in the measurement and prediction of hydrate formation for processing needs

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1994)
  • R.M. De Deugd et al.

    Mixed hydrates of methane and water-soluble hydrocarbons modeling of empirical results

    AICHE J.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Measurements and modeling of the hydrate phase equilibria of CO<inf>2</inf> in the presence of promoters

      2022, Fluid Phase Equilibria
      Citation Excerpt :

      When these models are used to predict the pure CO2 system, there are unavoidable deviations with the experimental data because most of them neglected the effect of CO2 solubility. Seif et al. [31] used vdW-P model to calculate the fugacity of hydrate phase and UNIFAC [49], van Laar [50], NRTL [32], UNIQUAC [51] to determine the activity of liquid phase, they found that NRTL model present the lowest deviation. However, for the (CO2+H2O+THF) system with a THF concentration of 3.0 mol%, the AADP(%) of Seif's model [31] was 12.60 whereas that of our proposed model was just 4.132.

    • Development of thermodynamic frameworks for modeling of clathrate hydrates stability conditions in porous media

      2021, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      He proposed that the enthalpy of clathrate hydrate dissociation could be related to its composition, and temperature depression due to the presence of an additive like an inhibitor in aqueous solution. Later, Moshfeghian and Maddox [33], Javanmardi et al. [34], Bardool et al. [35], and Parhizgar et al. [36] extended the enthalpy based approach to estimate the stability conditions of simple and mixed- clathrate hydrates in the aqueous solutions of methanol, aqueous mixed-electrolyte solutions, aqueous solutions of water-soluble organic promoters, and tetra-n-butyl ammonium halide aqueous solutions, respectively. Mehrabi et al. [37] theoretically studied clathrate hydrates stability conditions of different hydrate formers including methane, carbon dioxide, and natural gas in the presence of amino acids aqueous solutions using two different approaches: vdW-P theory-based approach [30] and the modified Pieroen model [32].

    • Export sales forecasting using artificial intelligence

      2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      These elements (functions, variables and constants) are determined by the user. Thus, the genetic program runs an evolutionary search in an enormous scope of equations, which can be expressed by the initial values (Bardool et al., 2016). Vanneschi and Poli (2012) argue that GP is capable of solving many problems in a competent manner, and, in a sense, it represents an endeavor to achieve the very ambitious goal of having the computer figure out an implementation for what a program is aimed to do, without specifying how, and just defining what.

    • The roles TBAF and SDS on the kinetics of methane hydrate formation as a cold storage material

      2020, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, slow kinetics and need to high operating pressures are the most important barriers to use these compounds in air conditioning systems [22–27]. Therefore, many researchers conducted studies to promote the kinetics and moderate the thermodynamics of gas hydrate formation (HF) process [25,28–46]. In order to moderate the thermodynamic conditions of gas HF, various thermodynamic additives such as THF, TBAB, TBAC, TBAF, TBPB were tested by researchers [25,40,47–60].

    • Simple and global correlation for the densities of deep eutectic solvents

      2019, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genetic programming (GP), first introduced by Cramer [66] and later expanded by Koza [67,68], is considered as an evolutionary algorithm, which is based on the Darwinian evolutionary theory. Due to its accuracy, GP has been widely used in the application of artificial intelligence to solve engineering problems and to determine the structure of phenomena [69,70]. In the GP method, blocks that contain the input and target variables, as well as their associated function, are first defined, and then the proper structure of the pattern and its coefficients are determined.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text