Skip to main content

Evolving Fuzzy Detectives: An Investigation into the Evolution of Fuzzy Rules

  • Conference paper
Soft Computing in Industrial Applications

Abstract

This paper explores the use of genetic programming to evolve fuzzy rules for the purpose of fraud detection. The fuzzy rule evolver designed during this research is described in detail. Four key system evaluation criteria are identified: intelligibility, speed, handling noisy data, and accuracy. Three sets of experiments are then performed in order to assess the performance of different components of the system, in terms of these criteria. The paper concludes: 1. that many factors affect accuracy of classification, 2. intelligibility and processing speed mainly seem to be affected by the fuzzy membership functions and 3. noise can cause loss of accuracy proportionate to the square of noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bentley, P. J. & Wakefield, J. P., 1996, Hierarchical Crossover in Genetic Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 1st On-line Workshop on Soft Computing (WSC1), (pp. 37–42), Nagoya University, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley, P. J. & Wakefield, J. P., 1997, Finding Acceptable Solutions in the Pareto-Optimal Range using Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms. Chawdhry, P.K.,Roy, R., & Pant, R.K. (eds) Soft Computing in Engineering Design and Manufacturing. Springer Verlag London Limited, Part 5, 231-240.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek, J. C. and Pal, S. K. (Ed.s), 1992, Fuzzy Models for Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dasarathy, B.V., 1980, Nosing Around the Neighborhood: A New System Structure and Classification Rule for Recognition in Partially Exposed Environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. PAMI-2, No. 1, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartigan, J. A, 1975, Clustering algorithms. Wiley, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosco, B., 1994, Fuzzy Thinking, the new science of fuzzy logic. Flamingo. Harper Collins Pub., London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koza, J., 1992, Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koza, J. et al., 1998, Genetic Programming ′98: Proceedings of the Third Annual Genetic Programming Conference. Morgan Kaufman Pub., CA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mallinson, H. and Bentley, P.J., 1999, Evolving Fuzzy Rules for Pattern Classification. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation — CIMCA′99.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marmelstein, R. E. and Lamont, G. B., 1998, Evolving Compact Decision Rule Sets. In Koza, John R. (ed.). Late Breaking Papers at the Genetic Programming 1997 Conference, Omni Press, pp. 144-150.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mc. Neill, D. and Freiberger, P., 1993, Fuzzy Logic. Touch Stone Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pedrycz, W. (Ed.), 1997, Fuzzy Evolutionary Computation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolberg, W. H., and Mangasarian, O. L., 1990, Multisurface method of pattern separation for medical diagnosis applied to breast cytology. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 9193–9196.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, T. and Bentley, P., 1998, Methods to Evolve Legal Phenotypes. In Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature. Amsterdam, Sept 27-30, 1998, pp. 280-282.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zadeh, L. A., 1965, Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Information and Control, v8, 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, J. (1992). Selecting typical instances in instance-based learning. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Machine Learning Conference, pp. 470–479. Aberdeen, Scotland: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bentley, P.J. (2000). Evolving Fuzzy Detectives: An Investigation into the Evolution of Fuzzy Rules. In: Suzuki, Y., Ovaska, S., Furuhashi, T., Roy, R., Dote, Y. (eds) Soft Computing in Industrial Applications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0509-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0509-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1155-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0509-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics