Abstract
Premature convergence is a serious problem that plagues genetic programming, stifling its search performance. Several genetic diversity maintenance techniques have been proposed for combating premature convergence and improving search efficiency in genetic programming. Recent research has shown that while genetic diversity is important, focusing directly on sustaining behavioral diversity may be more beneficial. These two related areas have received a lot of attention, yet they have often been developed independently. We investigated the feasibility of hybrid genetic and behavioral diversity techniques on a suite of problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beadle, L., Johnson, C.: Semantically driven crossover in genetic programming. In: Wang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, pp. 111–116. IEEE Computational Intelligence Society, IEEE Press, Hong Kong (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2008.4630784. http://results.ref.ac.uk/Submissions/Output/1423275
Burke, E.K., Gustafson, S., Kendall, G.: Diversity in genetic programming: an analysis of measures and correlation with fitness. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 8(1), 47–62 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2003.819263. http://www.cs.nott.ac.uk/~smg/research/publications/gustafson-ieee2004-preprint.pdf
Burks, A.R., Punch, W.F.: An efficient structural diversity technique for genetic programming. In: Silva, S., Esparcia-Alcazar, A.I., Lopez-Ibanez, M., Mostaghim, S., Timmis, J., Zarges, C., Correia, L., Soule, T., Giacobini, M., Urbanowicz, R., Akimoto, Y., Glasmachers, T., Fernandez de Vega, F., Hoover, A., Larranaga, P., Soto, M., Cotta, C., Pereira, F.B., Handl, J., Koutnik, J., Gaspar-Cunha, A., Trautmann, H., Mouret, J.B., Risi, S., Costa, E., Schuetze, O., Krawiec, K., Moraglio, A., Miller, J.F., Widera, P., Cagnoni, S., Merelo, J., Hart, E., Trujillo, L., Kessentini, M., Ochoa, G., Chicano, F., Doerr, C. (eds.) GECCO ’15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 991–998. ACM, Madrid (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2739480.2754649. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2739480.2754649
De Jong, K.A.: Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Computer and Communication Sciences Department (1975)
de Jong, E., Watson, R., Pollack, J.: Reducing bloat and promoting diversity using multi-objective methods. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2001, pp. 11–18. Morgan Kaufmann, New York (2001)
Gathercole, C., Ross, P.: The max problem for genetic programming - highlighting an adverse interaction between the crossover operator and a restriction on tree depth. Technical report, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (1995). http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/gathercole95max.html
Goldberg, D.E., Richardson, J.: Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In: Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 41–49. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)
Helmuth, T., Spector, L., Matheson, J.: Solving uncompromising problems with lexicase selection. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(5), 630–643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2014.2362729
Hornby, G.S.: Alps: the age-layered population structure for reducing the problem of premature convergence. In: Keijzer, M., Cattolico, M., Arnold, D., Babovic, V., Blum, C., Bosman, P., Butz, M.V., Coello Coello, C., Dasgupta, D., Ficici, S.G., Foster, J., Hernandez-Aguirre, A., Hornby, G., Lipson, H., McMinn, P., Moore, J., Raidl, G., Rothlauf, F., Ryan, C., Thierens, D. (eds.) GECCO 2006: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 815–822. ACM Press, Seattle (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1143997.1144142. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco2006/docs/p815.pdf
Hu, J., Seo, K., Li, S., Fan, Z., Rosenberg, R.C., Goodman, E.D.: Structure fitness sharing (SFS) for evolutionary design by genetic programming. In: Langdon, W.B., Cantú-Paz, E., Mathias, K., Roy, R., Davis, D., Poli, R., Balakrishnan, K., Honavar, V., Rudolph, G., Wegener, J., Bull, L., Potter, M.A., Schultz, A.C., Miller, J.F., Burke, E., Jonoska, N. (eds.) GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 780–787. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, New York (2002). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco2002/GP195.pdf
Hu, J., Goodman, E., Seo, K., Fan, Z., Rosenberg, R.: The hierarchical fair competition framework for sustainable evolutionary algorithms. Evol. Comput. 13(2), 241–277 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1162/1063656054088530
Jackson, D.: Phenotypic diversity in initial genetic programming populations. In: Esparcia-Alcazar, A.I., Ekart, A., Silva, S., Dignum, S., Uyar, A.S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Genetic Programming, EuroGP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6021, pp. 98–109. Springer, Istanbul (2010)
Jackson, D.: Promoting phenotypic diversity in genetic programming. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kolodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN 2010 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6239, pp. 472–481. Springer, Krakow (2010)
Krawiec, K., O’Reilly, U.M.: Behavioral programming: a broader and more detailed take on semantic GP. In: Igel, C., Arnold, D.V., Gagne, C., Popovici, E., Auger, A., Bacardit, J., Brockhoff, D., Cagnoni, S., Deb, K., Doerr, B., Foster, J., Glasmachers, T., Hart, E., Heywood, M.I., Iba, H., Jacob, C., Jansen, T., Jin, Y., Kessentini, M., Knowles, J.D., Langdon, W.B., Larranaga, P., Luke, S., Luque, G., McCall, J.A.W., Montes de Oca, M.A., Motsinger-Reif, A., Ong, Y.S., Palmer, Y.S., Parsopoulos, K.E., Raidl, G., Risi, S., Ruhe, G., Schaul, T., Schmickl, T., Sendhoff, B., Stanley, K.O., Stuetzle, T., Thierens, D., Togelius, J., Witt, C., Zarges, C. (eds.) GECCO ’14: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 935–942. ACM, Vancouver (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598288. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2576768.2598288. Best paper
Langdon, W.B., Poli, R.: Foundations of Genetic Programming. Springer, Berlin (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04726-2. http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/W.Langdon/FOGP/
Martinez, Y., Trujillo, L., Naredo, E., Legrand, P.: A comparison of fitness-case sampling methods for symbolic regression with genetic programming. In: Tantar, A.A., Tantar, E., Sun, J.Q., Zhang, W., Ding, Q., Schuetze, O., Emmerich, M., Legrand, P., Del Moral, P., Coello Coello, C.A. (eds.) EVOLVE - A Bridge Between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics, and Evolutionary Computation V. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 288, pp. 201–212. Springer, Peking (2014)
McDermott, J., White, D.R., Luke, S., Manzoni, L., Castelli, M., Vanneschi, L., Jaskowski, W., Krawiec, K., Harper, R., De Jong, K., O’Reilly, U.M.: Genetic programming needs better benchmarks. In: Soule, T., Auger, A., Moore, J., Pelta, D., Solnon, C., Preuss, M., Dorin, A., Ong, Y.S., Blum, C., Silva, D.L., Neumann, F., Yu, T., Ekart, A., Browne, W., Kovacs, T., Wong, M.L., Pizzuti, C., Rowe, J., Friedrich, T., Squillero, G., Bredeche, N., Smith, S.L., Motsinger-Reif, A., Lozano, J., Pelikan, M., Meyer-Nienberg, S., Igel, C., Hornby, G., Doursat, R., Gustafson, S., Olague, G., Yoo, S., Clark, J., Ochoa, G., Pappa, G., Lobo, F., Tauritz, D., Branke, J., Deb, K. (eds.) GECCO ’12: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 791–798. ACM, Philadelphia (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2330163.2330273
McKay, R.I.B.: Fitness sharing in genetic programming. In: Whitley, D., Goldberg, D., Cantu-Paz, E., Spector, L., Parmee, I., Beyer, H.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), pp. 435–442. Morgan Kaufmann, Las Vegas (2000). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco2000/GP256.pdf
McPhee, N.F., Hopper, N.J.: Analysis of genetic diversity through population history. In: Banzhaf, W., Daida, J., Eiben, A.E., Garzon, M.H., Honavar, V., Jakiela, M., Smith, R.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1112–1120. Morgan Kaufmann, Orlando (1999). http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco1999/GP-421.pdf
McPhee, N.F., Ohs, B., Hutchison, T.: Semantic building blocks in genetic programming. Working Paper Series, vol. 3(2), University of Minnesota Morris, Morris (2007)
Moraglio, A., Krawiec, K., Johnson, C.G.: Geometric semantic genetic programming. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Cutello, V., Deb, K., Forrest, S., Nicosia, G., Pavone, M. (eds.) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XII (Part 1). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7491, pp. 21–31. Springer, Taormina (2012)
Nguyen, Q.U., Nguyen, X.H., O’Neill, M., Agapitos, A.: An investigation of fitness sharing with semantic and syntactic distance metrics. In: Moraglio, A., Silva, S., Krawiec, K., Machado, P., Cotta, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Genetic Programming, EuroGP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7244, pp. 109–120. Springer, Malaga (2012)
Nguyen, Q.U., Pham, T.A., Nguyen, X.H., McDermott, J.: Subtree semantic geometric crossover for genetic programming. Genet. Program Evolvable Mach. 17(1), 25–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-015-9253-5
Poli, R., Langdon, W.B.: On the search properties of different crossover operators in genetic programming. In: Koza, J.R., Banzhaf, W., Chellapilla, K., Deb, K., Dorigo, M., Fogel, D.B., Garzon, M.H., Goldberg, D.E., Iba, H., Riolo, R. (eds.) Genetic Programming 1998: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference, pp. 293–301. Morgan Kaufmann, University of Wisconsin, Madison (1998). http://www.cs.essex.ac.uk/staff/poli/papers/Poli-GP1998.pdf
Schmidt, M., Lipson, H.: Age-fitness Pareto optimization. In: Riolo, R., McConaghy, T., Vladislavleva, E. (eds.) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VIII. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, chap. 8, pp. 129–146. Springer, Ann Arbor (2010). http://www.springer.com/computer/ai/book/978-1-4419-7746-5
Spector, L., Clark, D.M., Lindsay, I., Barr, B., Klein, J.: Genetic programming for finite algebras. In: Keijzer, M., Antoniol, G., Congdon, C.B., Deb, K., Doerr, B., Hansen, N., Holmes, J.H., Hornby, G.S., Howard, D., Kennedy, J., Kumar, S., Lobo, F.G., Miller, J.F., Moore, J., Neumann, F., Pelikan, M., Pollack, J., Sastry, K., Stanley, K., Stoica, A., Talbi, E.G., Wegener, I. (eds.) GECCO ’08: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1291–1298. ACM, Atlanta (2008). https://doi.org/10.1145/1389095.1389343. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco2008/docs/p1291.pdf
Uy, N.Q., Hoai, N.X., O’Neill, M., McKay, R.I., Galvan-Lopez, E.: Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression. Genet. Program Evolvable Mach. 12(2), 91–119 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-010-9121-2
Acknowledgements
This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. DBI-0939454. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. This work was supported in part by Michigan State University through computational resources provided by the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burks, A.R., Punch, W.F. (2018). An Investigation of Hybrid Structural and Behavioral Diversity Methods in Genetic Programming. In: Riolo, R., Worzel, B., Goldman, B., Tozier, B. (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIV. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97088-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97088-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97087-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97088-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)