Abstract
Model evaluation in symbolic regression generated by GP is of critical importance for successful industrial applications. Typically this model evaluation is achieved by a tradeoff between model complexity and R 2. The chapter introduces a model comparison approach based on the transmission of variation from the inputs to the output. The approach is illustrated with three different data sets from real industrial applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications. John Wiley & Sons
Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall
Castillo F, Kordon A, Smits G (2006) Robust pareto front genetic programming parameter selection based on design of experiments and industrial data. In: Riolo RL, Soule T, Worzel B (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice IV, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, vol 5, Springer, Ann Arbor, chap 2, pp 149–166
Castillo F, Kordon A, Villa C (2010) Genetic programming transforms in linear regression situations. In: Riolo R, McConaghy T, Vladislavleva E (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VIII, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, vol 8, Springer, Ann Arbor, USA, chap 11, pp 175–194
Kordon A (2009) Applied Computational Intelligence. Springer
Montgomery D, Peck E (1992) Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons
Morrison S (1999) Variance synthesis revisited. Quality Engineering 11:149–155
Neter J, Kutner M, Nachtscheim C, Wasserman W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill
Papadopoulos C (2001) Uncertainty Estimation and Monte Carlo Simulation Method. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 12:291–298
Schwartz LM (1975) Random error propagation by monte carlo simulation. Analytical Chemistry 47:964–964
Seavey K, Jones A, Kordon A, Smits G (2010) Hybrid Genetic Programming - First-Principles Approach To Process and Product Modeling. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Ressearch 47:963–964
Smits G, Kotanchek M (2004) Pareto-front exploitation in symbolic regression. In: O’Reilly UM, Yu T, Riolo RL, Worzel B (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II, Springer, Ann Arbor, chap 17, pp 283–299
Wackerly D, Mendenhall W, Scheaffer R (2007) Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 7th ed. Duxbury Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castillo, F.A., Villa, C.M., Kordon, A.K. (2013). Symbolic Regression Model Comparison Approach Using Transmitted Variation. In: Riolo, R., Vladislavleva, E., Ritchie, M., Moore, J. (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice X. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6846-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6846-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6845-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6846-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)