skip to main content
10.1145/2908961.2931734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Glycemia in Diabetic Patients By Evolutionary Computation and Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Diabetes mellitus is a disease that affects more than three hundreds million people worldwide. Maintaining a good control of the disease is critical to avoid not only severe long-term complications but also dangerous short-term situations. Diabetics need to decide the appropriate insulin injection, thus they need to be able to estimate the level of glucose they are going to have after a meal. In this paper we use machine learning techniques for predicting glycemia in diabetic patients. The algorithms utilize data collected from real patients by a continuous glucose monitoring system, the estimated number of carbohydrates, and insulin administration for each meal. We compare (1) non-linear regression with fixed model structure, (2) identification of prognosis models by symbolic regression using genetic programming, (3) prognosis by k-nearest-neighbor time series search, and (4) identification of prediction models by grammatical evolution. We consider predictions horizons of 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes.

References

  1. Michael Affenzeller, Stephan Winkler, Stefan Wagner, and Andreas Beham. Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming - Modern Concepts and Practical Applications. Chapman & Hall / CRC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Naomi S. Altman. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3):175--185, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Wolfgang Banzhaf and Christian W.G. Lasarczyk. Genetic programming of an algorithmic chemistry. In U. O'Reilly, T. Yu, R. Riolo, and B. Worzel, editors, Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II, pages 175--190. Ann Arbor, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Cobelli, C. Dalla Man, G. Sparacino, L. Magni, G. De Nicolao, and B.P. Kovatchev. Diabetes: Models, signals, and control. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Reviews in, 2:54 --96, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. International Diabetes Foundation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2014, https://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/Atlas-poster-2014_EN.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nikolaus Hansen and Andreas Ostermeier. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159--195, June 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael Kommenda, Gabriel Kronberger, Stefan Wagner, Stephan Winkler, and Michael Affenzeller. On the architecture and implementation of tree-based genetic programming in heuristiclab. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO '12, pages 101--108, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. John R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. The MIT Press, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C.D. Man, R.A. Rizza, and C. Cobelli. Mixed meal simulation model of glucose-insulin system. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pages 307--310, 30 2006-Sept. 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ingo Rechenberg. Evolutionsstrategie. Friedrich Frommann Verlag, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hans-Paul Schwefel. Evolutionsstrategie und numerische Optimierung. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Sparacino, F. Zanderigo, S. Corazza, A. Maran, A. Facchinetti, and C. Cobelli. Glucose concentration can be predicted ahead in time from continuous glucose monitoring sensor time-series. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 54(5):931--937, may 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stefan Wagner, Gabriel Kronberger, Andreas Beham, Michael Kommenda, Andreas Scheibenpflug, Erik Pitzer, Stefan Vonolfen, Monika Kofler, Stephan M. Winkler, Viktoria Dorfer, and Michael Affenzeller. Architecture and design of the heuristiclab optimization environment. Advanced Methods and Applications in Computational Intelligence, Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, 6:197--261, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Stephan M. Winkler. Evolutionary System Identification: Modern Concepts and Practical Applications. Schriften der Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz. Universitatsverlag Rudolf Trauner, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. David Zeevi and Tal Korem et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell, 163(5):1079--1094, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Glycemia in Diabetic Patients By Evolutionary Computation and Continuous Glucose Monitoring

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
          July 2016
          1510 pages
          ISBN:9781450343237
          DOI:10.1145/2908961

          Copyright © 2016 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 July 2016

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO '16 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate137of381submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader