skip to main content
10.1145/1569901.1569997acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scalability, generalization and coevolution -- experimental comparisons applied to automated facility layout planning

Published:08 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several practical problems in industry are difficult to optimize, both in terms of scalability and representation. Heuristics designed by domain experts are frequently applied to such problems. However, designing optimized heuristics can be a non-trivial task. One such difficult problem is the Facility Layout Problem (FLP) which is concerned with the allocation of activities to space. This paper is concerned with the block layout problem, where the activities require a fixed size and shape (modules). This problem is commonly divided into two sub problems; one of creating an initial feasible layout and one of improving the layout by interchanging the location of activities. We investigate how to extract novel heuristics for the FLP by applying an approach called Cooperative Coevolutionary Gene Expression Programming (CCGEP). By taking advantage of the natural problem decomposition, one species evolves heuristics for pre-scheduling, and another for allocating the activities onto the plant. An experimental, comparative approach investigates various features of the CCGEP approach. The results show that the evolved heuristics converge to suboptimal solutions as the problem size grows. However, coevolution has a positive effect on optimization of single problem instances. Expensive fitness evaluations may be limited by evolving generalized heuristics applicable to unseen fitness cases of arbitrary sizes.

References

  1. ]]Sahni, S., Gonzalez, T.: P-Complete Approximation Problems. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 23(3) (1976) 555--565 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. ]]Mavridou, T., Pardalos, P.: Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms for the Facility Layout Problem: A Survey. Computational Optimization and Applications 7(1) (1997) 111--126 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. ]]Stanley, K., Miikkulainen, R.: A Taxonomy for Artificial Embryogeny. Artificial Life 9(2) (2003) 93--130 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. ]]Bentley, P.: Evolutionary Design by Computers with CDrom. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA (1999) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. ]]Furuholmen, M., Hovin, M., Torresen, J., Glette, K.: Continuous Adaptation in Robotic Systems by Indirect Online Evolution. Learning and Adaptive Behaviors for Robotic Systems, Lab-Rs 2008, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 6-8 August 2008: Proceedings (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. ]]Furuholmen, M., Glette, K., Torresen, J., Hovin, M.: Indirect Online Evolution - A Conceptual Framework for Adaptation in industrial Robotic Systems. Evolvable Systems: From Biology to Hardware: 8th International Conference, ICES 2008, Prague, Czech Republic, September 2008: Proceedings (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. ]]Meller, R., Gau, K.: The facility layout problem: Recent and emerging trends and perspectives. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 15(5) (1996) 351--366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. ]]Singh, S., Sharma, R.: A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 30(5) (2006) 425--433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. ]]Michalek, J., Choudhary, R., Papalambros, P.: Architectural Layout Design Optimization. Engineering Optimization 34(5) (2002) 461--484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. ]]Garces-Perez, J., Schoenefeld, D., Wainwright, R.: Solving facility layout problems using genetic programming. (In: Proc. 1st Annual Conf. on Genetic Programming (GP-96)) 182--190 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. ]]Leung, J.: A new graph-theoretic heuristic for facility layout. Management Science 38(4) (1992) 594--605Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. ]]Liggett, R.: Automated facilities layout: past, present and future. Automation in Construction 9(2) (2000) 197--215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. ]]Potter, M., De Jong, K.: A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE (1994) 249--249 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. ]]Ferreira, C.: Gene Expression Programming: a New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems. Arxiv preprint cs.AI/0102027 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scalability, generalization and coevolution -- experimental comparisons applied to automated facility layout planning

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
                    July 2009
                    2036 pages
                    ISBN:9781605583259
                    DOI:10.1145/1569901

                    Copyright © 2009 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 8 July 2009

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

                    Upcoming Conference

                    GECCO '24
                    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
                    July 14 - 18, 2024
                    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader