Abstract
We distinguish between two main types of model: predictive and explanatory. It is argued (in the absence of models that predict on unseen data) that in order for a model to increase our understanding of the target system the model must credibly represent the structure of that system, including the relevant aspects of agent cognition. Merely “plugging in” an existing algorithm for the agent cognition will not help in such understanding. In order to demonstrate that the cognitive model matters, we compare two multi-agent stock market models that differ only in the type of algorithm used by the agents to learn. We also present a positive example where a neural net is used to model an aspect of agent behaviour in a more descriptive manner.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Edmonds, B. (2000) The Use of Models-making MABS actually work. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979:15–32.
Chattoe, E. (1998) Just How (Un)realistic are Evolutionary Algorithms as Representations of Social Processes?, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(3), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/2.html>
Chialvo, D.R., Bak, P. (1999) Learning from mistakes, Neuroscience 90:1137–1148.
Mayer, T. (1975). Selecting Economic Hypotheses by Goodness of Fit. Econ. J., 85:877–883.
Montana, D.J. (1995). Strongly Typed Genetic Programming, Evol. Comput., 3:199–230.
Moss, S. (2001). Game Theory: Limitations and an Alternative, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 4(2), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/2.html
Palmer, R.G. et. al. (1994). Artificial Economic Life-A Simple Model of a Stockmarket. Physica D, 75:264–274.
Wolpert, D.H. and Macready, W. G. (1995) No Free Lunch Theorems for Search, Technical Report, Santa Fe Institute, Number SFI-TR-95-02-010, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Edmonds, B., Moss, S. (2001). The Importance of Representing Cognitive Processes in Multi-agent Models. In: Dorffner, G., Bischof, H., Hornik, K. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2001. ICANN 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44668-0_106
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44668-0_106
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42486-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44668-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive