Skip to main content

The Importance of Representing Cognitive Processes in Multi-agent Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2001 (ICANN 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2130))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We distinguish between two main types of model: predictive and explanatory. It is argued (in the absence of models that predict on unseen data) that in order for a model to increase our understanding of the target system the model must credibly represent the structure of that system, including the relevant aspects of agent cognition. Merely “plugging in” an existing algorithm for the agent cognition will not help in such understanding. In order to demonstrate that the cognitive model matters, we compare two multi-agent stock market models that differ only in the type of algorithm used by the agents to learn. We also present a positive example where a neural net is used to model an aspect of agent behaviour in a more descriptive manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Edmonds, B. (2000) The Use of Models-making MABS actually work. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979:15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattoe, E. (1998) Just How (Un)realistic are Evolutionary Algorithms as Representations of Social Processes?, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(3), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/3/2.html>

  • Chialvo, D.R., Bak, P. (1999) Learning from mistakes, Neuroscience 90:1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T. (1975). Selecting Economic Hypotheses by Goodness of Fit. Econ. J., 85:877–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montana, D.J. (1995). Strongly Typed Genetic Programming, Evol. Comput., 3:199–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. (2001). Game Theory: Limitations and an Alternative, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 4(2), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/2/2.html

  • Palmer, R.G. et. al. (1994). Artificial Economic Life-A Simple Model of a Stockmarket. Physica D, 75:264–274.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D.H. and Macready, W. G. (1995) No Free Lunch Theorems for Search, Technical Report, Santa Fe Institute, Number SFI-TR-95-02-010, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Edmonds, B., Moss, S. (2001). The Importance of Representing Cognitive Processes in Multi-agent Models. In: Dorffner, G., Bischof, H., Hornik, K. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks — ICANN 2001. ICANN 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44668-0_106

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44668-0_106

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42486-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44668-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics