skip to main content
10.1145/2576768.2598211acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Passive solar building design using genetic programming

Published:12 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Passive solar building design considers the effect that sunlight has on energy usage. The goal is to reduce the need for artificial cooling and heating devices, thereby saving energy costs. A number of competing design objectives can arise. Window heat gain during winter requires large windows. These same windows, however, reduce energy efficiency during nights and summers. Other model requirements add further complications, which creates a challenging optimization problem. We use genetic programming for passive solar building design. The EnergyPlus system is used to evaluate energy consumption. It considers factors ranging from model construction (shape, windows, materials) to location particulars (latitude/longitude, weather, time of day/year). We use a strongly typed design language to build 3D models, and multi-objective fitness to evaluate the multiple design objectives. Experimental results showed that balancing window heat gain and total energy use is challenging, although our multi-objective strategy could find interesting compromises. Many factors (roof shape, material selection) were consistently optimized by evolution. We also found that geographic aspects of the location play a critical role in the final building design.

References

  1. U. E. P. Agency. Green building basic information, October 2010. http://www.epa.gov/greenbuilding/pubs/about.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Bentley and D. Corne. Creative Evolutionary Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. J. Bentley and J. P. Wakefield. Finding acceptable solutions in the pareto-optimal range using multiobjective genetic algorithms. In Soft Computing in Engineering Design and Manufacturing, pages 231--240. Springer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Bergen and B. Ross. Evolutionary Art Using Summed Multi-objective Ranks. In Genetic Programming - Theory and Practice VIII, pages 227--244. Springer, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Bouchlaghem. Optimising the design of building envelopes for thermal performance. Automation in Construction, 10(1):101--112, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Byrne, M. Fenton, E. Hemberg, J. McDermott, M. O'Neill, E. Shotton, and C. Nally. Combining structural analysis and multi-objective criteria for evolutionary architectural design. In Applications of Evolutionary Computation, volume 6625 of LNCS, pages 204--213. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Caldas. Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying gene arch: An evolution-based generative design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(1):59--70, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. G. Caldas and L. K. Norford. Shape generation using pareto genetic algorithms: integrating conflicting design objectives in low-energy architecture. Intl. Journal of Architectural Computing, 1(4):503--515, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. A. C. Coello, G. B. Lamont, and D. A. Van Veldhuisen. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Coia and B. Ross. Automatic evolution of conceptual building architectures. In Proc. CEC, pages 1140--1147. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Corne and J. Knowles. Techniques for highly multiobjective optimisation: Some nondominated points are better than others. In Proc. GECCO 2007, pages 773--780. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Flack and B. Ross. Evolution of architectural floor plans. In Proc. App. of Evolutionary Computation (EvoStar), volume 6625 of LNCS, pages 313--322. Springer-Verlag, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. M. O. Gholami. Passive solar building design using genetic programming. Master's thesis, Brock University, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Harrington and B. Ross. Generative representations for artificial architecture and passive solar performance. In Proc. CEC 2013, pages 537--545. IEEE, June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Y. Ji and S. Plainiotis. Design for sustainability. China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Lobos and D. Donath. The problem of space layout in architecture: A survey and reflections. arquiteturarevista, 6(2):136--161, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Luke. Ecj. Last accessed Mar 24, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. M. Malkawi, R. S. Srinivasan, Y. K. Yi, and R. Choudhary. Decision support and design evolution: integrating genetic algorithms, cfd and visualization. Automation in Construction, 14(1):33--44, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. P. Marin, J.-C. Bignon, and H. Lequay. Generative exploration of architectural envelope responding to solar passive qualities. In Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. Eindhoven U of Tech, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. McKay, N. Hoai, P. Whigham, Y. Shan, and M. O'Neill. Grammar-based Genetic Programming: a Survey. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 11:365--396, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. J. Montana. Strongly typed genetic programming. Evolutionary Computation, 3(2):199--230, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. P. Muller, P. Wonka, S. Haegler, A. Ulmer, and L. V. Gool. Procedural modeling of buildings. In Proc. SIGGRAPH, pages 614--623, New York, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. U. D. of Energy. Energyplus energy simulation software, October 2012. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. O'Neill, J. McDermott, J. M. Swafford, J. Byrne, E. Hemberg, A. Brabazon, E. Shotton, C. McNally, and M. Hemberg. Evolutionary design using grammatical evolution and shape grammars: Designing a shelter. International Journal of Design Engineering, 3(1):4--24, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. U.-M. O'Reilly and M. Hemberg. Integrating generative growth and evolutionary computation for form exploration. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 8(2):163--186, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Steadman. The Evolution of Designs. Routledge, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Turrin, P. von Buelow, R. Stouffs, and A. Kilian. Performance-oriented design of large passive solar roofs. In Proc. ECAADE. ETH, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. P. von Buelow. Genetically Engineered Architecture. VDM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. A. Wright, H. A. Loosemore, and R. Farmani. Optimization of building thermal design and control by multi-criterion genetic algorithm. Energy and Buildings, 34(9):959--972, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. T. Yu. Modeling occupancy behavior for energy efficiency and occupants comfort management in intelligent buildings. In Proc. ICMLA, pages 726--731. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GECCO '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
    July 2014
    1478 pages
    ISBN:9781450326629
    DOI:10.1145/2576768

    Copyright © 2014 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 July 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    GECCO '14 Paper Acceptance Rate180of544submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

    Upcoming Conference

    GECCO '24
    Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
    July 14 - 18, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader