Abstract
We present an algorithm that can anticipate tax evasion by modeling the co-evolution of tax schemes with auditing policies. Malicious tax non-compliance, or evasion, accounts for billions of lost revenue each year. Unfortunately when tax administrators change the tax laws or auditing procedures to eliminate known fraudulent schemes another potentially more profitable scheme takes it place. Modeling both the tax schemes and auditing policies within a single framework can therefore provide major advantages. In particular we can explore the likely forms of tax schemes in response to changes in audit policies. This can serve as an early warning system to help focus enforcement efforts. In addition, the audit policies can be fine tuned to help improve tax scheme detection. We demonstrate our approach using the iBOB tax scheme and show it can capture the co-evolution between tax evasion and audit policy. Our experiments shows the expected oscillatory behavior of a biological co-evolving system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accountancy JO (2015) http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2015/oct/partnership-audit-and-adjustment-rules-201513294.html
Allingham MG, Sandmo A (1972) Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. J Public Econ 1(3–4):323–338
Andrei AL, Comer K, Koehler M (2013) An agent-based model of network effects on tax compliance and evasion. J Econ Psychol 40:119–133
Andreoni J, Erard B, Feinstein J (1998) Tax compliance. J Econ Lit 36:818–860
Aubert S, Müller JP (2013) Incorporating institutions, norms and territories in a generic model to simulate the management of renewable resources. Artif Intell Law 21(1):47–78
Bench-Capon T, Araszkiewicz M, Ashley K, Atkinson K, Bex F, Borges F, Bourcier D, Bourgine P, Conrad JG, Francesconi E et al (2012) A history of ai and law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on ai and law. Artif Intell Law 20(3):215–319
Bloomquist K (2011) Tax compliance as an evolutionary coordination game: an agent-based approach. Public Finance Rev 39(1):25–49
Bloomquist KM (2006) A comparison of agent-based models of income tax evasion. Soc Sci Comput Rev 24(4):411–425
Boer A, van Engers T (2013) Agile: a problem-based model of regulatory policy making. Artif Intell Law 21(4):399–423
Bonchi F, Giannotti F, Mainetto G, Pedreschi D (1999) A classification-based methodology for planning audit strategies in fraud detection. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 175–184
Buchanan BG, Headrick TE (1970) Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stanford Law Review, pp 40–62
Davis JS, Hecht G, Perkins JD (2003) Social behaviors, enforcement, and tax compliance dynamics. Account Rev 78(1):39–69
DeBarr D, Eyler-Walker Z (2006) Closing the gap: automated screening of tax returns to identify egregious tax shelters. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 8(1):11–16
Dechesne F, Di Tosto G, Dignum V, Dignum F (2013) No smoking here: values, norms and culture in multi-agent systems. Artif Intell Law 21(1):79–107
de Jong ED, Stanley KO, Wiegand RP (2007) Introductory tutorial on coevolution. In: GECCO (Companion), pp 3133–3157
Ficici SG, Bucci A (2007) Advanced tutorial on coevolution. In: GECCO (Companion), pp 3172–3204
GAO (2013) Gao-14-453. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8VDUStvxMY
GAO (2014a) http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/663185.pdf
GAO (2014b) http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/661772.pdf
Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-wesley, Boston
Hemberg E, Rosen J, Warner G, Wijesinghe S, O’Reilly UM (2015) Tax non-compliance detection using co-evolution of tax evasion risk and audit likelihood. In: ICAIL
Hokamp S, Pickhardt M (2010) Income tax evasion in a society of heterogeneous agents-evidence from an agent-based model. Int Econ J 24(4):541–553
Hokamp S, Seibold G (2014) How much rationality tolerates the shadow economy?—an agent-based econophysics approach. In: Advances in social simulation. Springer, Berlin, pp 119–128
IRS (2006) The tax gap. http://www.irs.gov/uac/IRS-The-Tax-Gap
IRS (2014a) Irs audits. http://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/IRS-Audits
IRS (2014b) Sales and trades of investment property. http://www.irs.gov/publications/p550/ch04.html
Jaideep KWHNP, Bjorklund SGTE (2009) Data mining based tax audit selection: a case study from minnesota department of revenue. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on data mining case studies. ACM, pp 23–35
Kallio M, Back B (2011) The self-organizing map in selecting companies for tax audit. In: Emerging Themes in information systems and organization studies. Physica-Verlag HD, pp 347–358
Katz DM, Bommarito MJ II (2014) Measuring the complexity of the law: the united states code. Artif Intell Law 22(4):337–374
Kingston J, Schafer B, Vandenberghe W (2004) Towards a financial fraud ontology: a legal modelling approach. Artif Intell Law 12(4):419–446
Korobow A, Johnson C, Axtell R (2007) An agent–based model of tax compliance with social networks. National Tax J, pp 589–610
Li WP, Azar P, Larochelle D, Hill P, Lo AW (2015) Law is code: a software engineering approach to analyzing the united states code. J Bus Technol Law 10:297
Lipatov V (2003) Evolution of tax evasion. Technical report, University Library of Munich, Germany
Lotzmann U, Möhring M, Troitzsch KG (2013) Simulating the emergence of norms in different scenarios. Artif Intell Law 21(1):109–138
May LR (2012) Using link analysis to identify indirect and multi-tiered ownership structures. In: SOI Tax Stats—2012 IRS-TPC research conference
McCarty LT (1977) Reflections on“ taxman”: an experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review pp 837–893
Mittone L, Patelli P (2000) Imitative behaviour in tax evasion. In: Economic simulations in swarm: agent-based modelling and object oriented programming. Springer, US, pp 133–158
Ngai E, Hu Y, Wong Y, Chen Y, Sun X (2011) The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: a classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decis Support Syst 50(3):559–569
Oard DW, Webber W (2013) Information retrieval for e-discovery. Inf Retr 7(2–3):99–237
O’Neill M, Ryan C (2003) Grammatical evolution: evolutionary automatic programming in an arbitrary language, vol 4. Springer, Berlin
Pickhardt M, Prinz A (2014) Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion-a survey. J Econ Psychol 40:1–19
Pickhardt M, Seibold G (2014) Income tax evasion dynamics: evidence from an agent-based econophysics model. J Econ Psychol 40:147–160
Rosen J, Hemberg E, Warner G, Wijesinghe S, O’Reilly UM (2015) Computer aided tax evasion policy analysis: directed search using autonomous agents. In: AAMAS
Rostain T, Regan MC (2014) Confidence games: lawyers, accountants, and the tax shelter industry, vol 1. MIT Press, Massachusetts
Sartor G, Rotolo A (2013) AI and law. In: Agreement technologies. Springer, Netherlands, pp 199–207
Stanley KO, Miikkulainen R (2004) Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. J Artif Intell Res JAIR 21:63–100
Surden H (2014) Machine learning and law. Wash L Rev 89:87–217
Van V et al (1973) A new evolutionary law. Evol Theory 1:1–30
Warner G, Wijesinghe S, Marques U, Badar O, Rosen J, Hemberg E, O’Reilly UM (2014) Modeling tax evasion with genetic algorithms. Econ Gov. doi:10.1007/s10101-014-0152-7
Wiegand RP, Potter MA (2006) Robustness in cooperative coevolution. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, pp 369–376
Wright Jr D (2013) Financial alchemy: how tax shelter promoters use financial products to bedevil the irs (and how the irs helps them). Ariz State Law J 45(2)
Zaklan G, Lima FW, Westerhoff F (2008) Controlling tax evasion fluctuations. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 387(23):5857–5861
Zaklan G, Westerhoff F, Stauffer D (2009) Analysing tax evasion dynamics via the ising model. J Econ Interact Coord 4(1):1–14
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hemberg, E., Rosen, J., Warner, G. et al. Detecting tax evasion: a co-evolutionary approach. Artif Intell Law 24, 149–182 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9181-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016-9181-6