New correlations for predicting pure and impure natural gas viscosity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.02.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • New correlations for predicting pure (CH4) and impure natural gas viscosity.

  • Good agreements for wide range of pressure, temperature and specific gravity.

  • Design of experiment is utilized to obtain the effective input model parameters.

  • Doubtful data points are determined based on Leverage Statistics approach.

  • Both statistical and graphical analyses are applied to the results.

Abstract

Accurate determination of natural gas viscosity is important for successful design of production, transportation, and gas storage systems. However, most of available models/correlations suffer from complexity, robustness, and inadequate accuracy especially when wide range of pressure and temperature is applied. Present study illustrates development of two novel models for predicting natural gas viscosity for pure natural gas (CH4) as well as natural gas containing impurities. For this purpose, 6484 data points have been gathered and analyzed from the open literature covering wide range of pressure, temperature, and specific gravity levels, temperature ranges from −262.39 to 620.33 °F (109.6 to 600 K), pressure ranges from 1.4508 to 29,000 psi (0.0100–199.94801 MPa), and gas specific gravity ranges from 0.553 to 1.5741. Sensitivity analysis on the collected data points through design of experiments algorithm showed that pseudo reduced pressure and pseudo reduced temperature are the most effective parameters as the inputs of the models. The Leverage Value Statistics is applied and doubtful data points are determined.

The average absolute relative error and the coefficient of determination of the proposed models for predicting pure/impure natural gas viscosity on a wide range of conditions are 5.67% and 1.87%, 0.9826 and 0.9953, respectively. Reliable accuracy of proposed models in comparison to eight commonly used correlations makes them attractive for possible implementing in natural gas simulation/modeling applications.

Introduction

Abundance, easily accessible, wide usage and clean burning of natural gas make its demand increasing in the world (Wang and Economides, 2013). The human needs to extract this vital fuel from the underground reservoir to the location of usage. It is worth bearing in mind that the most dominant portion of natural gas is constructed from methane (McCain, 1990). Through single-phase and multiphase flow in gas and oil reservoirs, wellbore, separator, turbine, compressor, surface operation devices and transportation pipelines, the knowledge of the thermo-physical properties of natural gas is indispensable (Kamari et al., 2013), which is covered in various fields of study such as gas production, gas injection, and carbon dioxide injection in oil wells (AlQuraishi and Shokir, 2011, Carr et al., 1954, Fayazi et al., 2013, Iverson and Denlinger, 2001, Shams et al., 2015). Natural gas is composed of complex mixtures of light hydrocarbons, heavy hydrocarbons with low viscosity and density and a minor amount of inorganic/non-hydrocarbon components such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Natural gas is a subcategory of petroleum fluids but its specifications are different from that of liquid hydrocarbon. Natural gas physical properties vary widely with pressure, temperature and composition (Davani et al., 2013, McCain, 1990).

One of the most used properties of natural gas is viscosity. Viscosity is the measure of fluid flow resistance (Carr et al., 1954, Geertsma, 1974). It plays an important role in the study of dynamics of fluids flow processes such that described above and in simulation application especially in porous spaces in chemical and petroleum engineering (Iverson and Denlinger, 2001). According to Newton's expression, viscosity is a constant proportional parameter (μ) which is used in following expression:τ=μvyτ is shear stress between bordering layers of fluid, vy is velocity gradient, perpendicular to layers direction. Practically, there is no exact theory that explains viscosity as a function of pressure, temperature and composition (Vesovic, 2001). Hence, one who needs to calculate accurate gas viscosity at desirable conditions should design an experiment, using apparatus such as vibrating wire viscometer (Wilhelm and Vogel, 2000), rolling-ball viscometer (Heidaryan et al., 2011), falling-body viscometer (Chan and Jackson, 1985, Heidaryan et al., 2010b), capillary tube viscometer (Jarrahian et al., 2015, Yusibani et al., 2011) or oscillating-piston viscometer (Davani et al., 2013). In addition, the gas viscosity is much more difficult to measure compared to the oil viscosity (AlQuraishi and Shokir, 2011).

A suitable viscosity model for implementation in simulators must: 1. trace the viscosity for full range condition of operation 2. be accurate, simple and fast; 3. forecast both pure component and mixture viscosities; 4. be reliable across the critical point.

The best of our knowledge, accurate experimental procedure needs to satisfy above conditions in measurement of viscosity. As well as, the various possible mixtures of natural gas and different operating conditions of interest hind acquisition of the pertinent data by experimental means alone. In addition, accurate measurement of natural gas viscosity is difficult and is necessary to optimize the number of wells in gas reservoirs, especially in high pressure/high temperature condition (Hu, 2013).

Consequently, in the absence of experimentally measured viscosity, it is essential to determine the viscosity from equations of state (EOSs), empirically derived correlations, and novel soft computing techniques.

As a result, using the EOSs to calculate the PVT properties of hydrocarbon fluids (Benedict et al., 1940) show that EOSs have poor capability to estimate the volumetric-properties of natural gas mixtures (Danesh et al., 1991, Elsharkawy, 2004, Younglove and Ely, 1987). As a standard approach, two steps are required to derive gas viscosity, the first step is to calculate gas viscosity at atmospheric condition then by using a graph, determine viscosity at desired condition (McCain, 1990). Up to now, several corresponding state models and empirical correlations have been introduced for calculating the gas viscosity under various pressure, temperature and composition. Some models that are used to predict the viscosity are under limited operating condition and sometimes have significant deviation and error, Some other are too complex and difficult to use (Danesh et al., 1991, Elsharkawy, 2004, Farasat et al., 2013, Younglove and Ely, 1987). Other category is soft computing methods. These models are based on black boxes, such as LS-SVM and ANN based models. In black box models (AlQuraishi and Shokir, 2011, Fayazi et al., 2013), there is no visual relationship between inputs and outputs. In order to use these models we should utilize a toolbox which maybe it is not easy to use in several cases, because the user usually need other software, which are not conventional.

Consequently, as one of several efforts by authors to present viscosity correlation for pure natural gas and mixtures, the main objective of the current work is to develop a useful, fast, accurate and simple viscosity correlation as a function of pressure, temperature and composition (Bicher Jr and Katz, 1943). In this study two correlations have been developed, one for pure (CH4) natural gases and one for impure (sour (with H2S) and sweet (without H2S)) natural gases, respectively.

To achieve these objectives, we accomplish following steps: Review several existing open literature, which contain a wide range of natural gas compositions, experimental conditions and viscosity data. Finally gather them as a comprehensive data bank. Investigate accuracy of gathered data by implementing Leverage Value Statistics. Build a new, exact, and trustworthy correlation for estimating the natural gas viscosity using the obtained data set. Investigate the reliability, performance and preciseness of the developed correlations by statistical parameters and visual error examination. To reach this aim, we use several impressiveness criteria such as the coefficient of determination (R2), average relative error (ARE %) and average absolute relative error (AARE %). Confirm validity of the constructed correlation by comparison with widely used correlations.

Section snippets

Review on previous studies

There are numerous correlations, which are developed to predict natural gas viscosity. It is suitable to introduce and investigate the eight well-known empirical correlations to be aware of effectiveness and accuracy of newly proposed correlations. In a characteristic manner, these correlations are functions of pressure, temperature and gas composition. For quickness view only, essential factors of these eight correlations are demonstrated as follows.

Genetic programming

Genetic programming (GP) is a powerful tool based on the genetic algorithm (GA); however, it is used for correlating and modeling projects. GP is functionally very similar to GA and evolves tree structures to perform a task. This method was introduced and gradually developed by Koza (1992).

GP is one of the few efficient machine-learning methods used to find solutions of complicated real problems. Furthermore, the main problem of other intelligent structures such as artificial neural networks is

Data acquisition and evaluation

6484 experimental natural gas viscosity data points were collected from 11 different studies from 1966 to 2013 (Assael et al., 2001, Atilhan et al., 2010a, Atilhan et al., 2010b, Davani et al., 2013, Friend et al., 1989, Goodwin, 2008, Kashefi et al., 2013, Langelandsvik et al., 2007, Lee et al., 1966, Schley et al., 2004, Younglove and Ely, 1987), the description of collected data is presented in Table 2. The collected data includes many different compositions ranging from sour natural gas

Theory

Accuracy and simplicity can be assumed as two main parameters affecting the efficiency of viscosity prediction model. Most of developed models are able to predict natural gas viscosity with an acceptable accuracy for their data banks. However comparison of the results of NGV prediction outside the application range of each model and even for new experimental data which were not previously used for model development, might lead to high errors. Moreover, most of models need complicated and

Result and discussion

The new NGV prediction model only consists of six terms, including simple functions and coefficients. Moreover, there is no need to determine gas density prior to viscosity calculations, the NGV can be predicted using simply one equation, and there is no need to calculate coefficients separately. In addition, there is only one set of coefficients for the whole range of pressure and gas gravity variations. Despite this simplicity, the correlation shows to be the most accurate one among other

Conclusion

In this study, two new models were developed and used for predicting gas viscosity for both cases pure natural gas and natural gas containing impurities. To do such, 6484 data points were collected and analyzed from literature covering temperature range of −262.39–620.33 °F (109.6–600 K), pressure range of 1.4508–29,000 psi (0.0100–199.94801 MPa), and gas gravity range from 0.553 to 1.5741. The Leverage Value Statistics is applied and doubtful data points are determined. Based on the results

References (60)

  • Azad Jarrahian et al.

    On the viscosity of natural gas

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • Arash Kamari

    Prediction of sour gas compressibility factor using an intelligent approach

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2013)
  • Khalil Kashefi

    Viscosity of binary and multicomponent hydrocarbon fluids at high pressure and high temperature conditions: measurements and predictions

    J. Pet. Sci. Eng.

    (2013)
  • Chirdpong Preechakul et al.

    Modified genetic algorithm with sampling techniques for chemical engineering optimization

    J. Industrial Eng. Chem.

    (2009)
  • Ehsan Sanjari et al.

    An accurate empirical correlation for predicting natural gas viscosity

    J. Nat. Gas Chem.

    (2011)
  • Reza Shams

    An intelligent modeling approach for prediction of thermal conductivity of CO 2

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2015)
  • Mostafa Vatani et al.

    Application of Genetic Algorithm to the calculation of parameters for NRTL and two-suffix margules models in ternary extraction ionic liquid systems

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2012)
  • Keelan Adamson

    High-pressure, high-temperature well construction

    Oilfield Rev.

    (1993)
  • Mohammad ali Ghayyem et al.

    Developing a simple and accurate correlation for initial estimation of hydrate formation temperature of sweet natural gases using an eclectic approach

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2014)
  • Mark J. Anderson et al.

    DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation

    (2015)
  • M.J. Assael et al.

    Viscosity of natural-gas mixtures: measurements and prediction

    Int. J. Thermophys.

    (2001)
  • Mert Atilhan

    Viscosity measurements and data correlation for two synthetic natural gas mixtures

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (2010)
  • Mert Atilhan

    On the viscosity of natural gases from Qatari north field reservoir

    J. Chem. Eng. Data

    (2010)
  • Manson Benedict et al.

    An empirical equation for thermodynamic properties of light hydrocarbons and their mixtures I. Methane, ethane, propane and n-butane

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1940)
  • B. Bicher Leo et al.

    Viscosities of the methane-propane system

    Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (1943)
  • Max Born et al.

    A general kinetic theory of liquids. I. The molecular distribution functions

  • G.E.P. Box et al.

    Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces

    (1987)
  • Norman L. Carr et al.

    Viscosity of hydrocarbon gases under pressure

    J. Pet. Technol.

    (1954)
  • R.K.Y. Chan et al.

    An automated falling-cylinder high pressure laser-Doppler viscometer

    J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum.

    (1985)
  • David E. Dean et al.

    The viscosity of nonpolar gas mixtures at moderate and high pressures

    AIChE J.

    (1965)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Towards improved genetic programming based-correlations for predicting the interfacial tension of the systems pure/impure CO<inf>2</inf>-brine

      2021, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genetic programming (GP) is a reliable machine learning (ML) technique which allows generating explicit and user-friendly correlations to rely input/output parameters that define complex systems. This approach belongs to the family of genetic algorithms which is inspired from the genetic and evolution theories [32]. GP was proposed and developed by [33].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text