Skip to main content

Identification of Dynamical Systems Using Symbolic Regression

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2019 (EUROCAST 2019)

Abstract

We describe a method for the identification of models for dynamical systems from observational data. The method is based on the concept of symbolic regression and uses genetic programming to evolve a system of ordinary differential equations (ODE).

The novelty is that we add a step of gradient-based optimization of the ODE parameters. For this we calculate the sensitivities of the solution to the initial value problem (IVP) using automatic differentiation.

The proposed approach is tested on a set of 19 problem instances taken from the literature which includes datasets from simulated systems as well as datasets captured from mechanical systems. We find that gradient-based optimization of parameters improves predictive accuracy of the models. The best results are obtained when we first fit the individual equations to the numeric differences and then subsequently fine-tune the identified parameter values by fitting the IVP solution to the observed variable values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://computation.llnl.gov/projects/sundials/cvodes.

References

  1. Bongard, J., Lipson, H.: Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104(24), 9943–9948 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, T.Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., Duvenaud, D.K.: Neural ordinary differential equations. In: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31, pp. 6571–6583. Curran Associates, Inc. (2018). http://papers.nips.cc/paper/7892-neural-ordinary-differential-equations.pdf

  3. Gaucel, S., Keijzer, M., Lutton, E., Tonda, A.: Learning dynamical systems using standard symbolic regression. In: Nicolau, M., et al. (eds.) EuroGP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8599, pp. 25–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44303-3_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Iba, H.: Inference of differential equation models by genetic programming. Inf. Sci. 178(23), 4453–4468 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Isermann, R., Münchhof, M.: Identification of Dynamic Systems: An Introduction with Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78879-9

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kommenda, M., Kronberger, G., Winkler, S., Affenzeller, M., Wagner, S.: Effects of constant optimization by nonlinear least squares minimization in symbolic regression. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1121–1128. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt, M., Lipson, H.: Data-mining dynamical systems: automated symbolic system identification for exploratory analysis. In: 9th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Volume 2: Automotive Systems; Bioengineering and Biomedical Technology; Computational Mechanics; Controls; Dynamical Systems, Haifa, Israel. ASME, July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt, M., Lipson, H.: Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324(5923), 81–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt, M., Lipson, H.: Supporting online material for distilling free-form natrual laws from experimental data, April 2009. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2009/04/02/324.5923.81.DC1

  10. Topchy, A., Punch, W.F.: Faster genetic programming based on local gradient search of numeric leaf values. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 155–162. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Worm, T., Chiu, K.: Scaling up prioritized grammar enumeration for scientific discovery in the cloud. In: IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp. 621–626. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) within project #867202, as well as the Christian Doppler Research Association and the Federal Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs within the Josef Ressel Centre for Symbolic Regression.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Kronberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kronberger, G., Kammerer, L., Kommenda, M. (2020). Identification of Dynamical Systems Using Symbolic Regression. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds) Computer Aided Systems Theory – EUROCAST 2019. EUROCAST 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12013. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45093-9_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45093-9_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-45092-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-45093-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics