Technical note
Fuzzy genetic programming method for analysis of ground movements due to underground mining

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.02.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The prediction of ground surface movements is an important problem in rock and soil mechanics in the excavation activities especially the coal and metal mining. Based on results of the statistical analysis of a large amount of measured data in underground excavation engineering, the fuzzy genetic programming method (FGPM) of ground surface movements is given by using the theory of fuzzy probability measures and genetic programming (GP). And genetic programming approach is proposed to determine the parameter of ground surface movements due to underground mining of coal in this paper. Genetic programming is trained by used practical mining induced surface movement data. The agreement of the theoretical results with the field measurements shows that the FGPM is satisfactory and the formulae obtained are valid and thus can be effectively used for predicting the ground surface movements due to underground mining, especially the mining of coal and metal.

Introduction

The ground surface movements due to underground mining has often resulted in major disasters throughout the world, frequently inflicting heavy losses of life and damage to property. The prediction of ground surface movements is an important problem in rock and soil mechanics in the excavation activities especially the coal and metal mining [1], [2], [3].

Underground mining causes the formation of surface subsidence trough. The prediction of the consequences of mining is an important task for the mine surveying service [4], [5]. The knowledge about the surface activity caused by mining, and the prediction of subsidence enable efficient repairs of the mining damage, and has a positive impact on the economic results of mining. Accurate and reliable prediction can, beside other factors, influence significantly the strategy of the operation of a mine. Due to a large number of parameters influencing the behaviour of the rock above the excavated space, the prediction of mining consequences is a demanding task. It is difficult to determine all the parameters, and it is even more difficult to determine their relative impact [2], [5], [6].

Displacements cause damage in different objects on the surface. Therefore, the aim of mine surveyors at the beginning of the last century was to estimate the impact of underground mining on buildings, transport systems and surface above mines. They started to measure the displacements of points in the mine and on the surface, in order to be able to control the subsidence process and to diminish the damages caused by the excavation. They prescribed procedures of monitoring displacements and developed the methods for the prediction of surface subsidence in individual mines [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Several prediction methods have been developed.

The first methods for the prediction of surface subsidence were empirical prediction methods. These methods are based on the correlation of measured data with the geometric parameters of the excavations. As these methods are derived from the measurements in a specific area, they are in direct relation to it, and the results are valid only for the investigated area.

Prediction methods based on influential functions form the second group of prediction methods. The influential function is used to describe the value of the impact of elementary part of the excavation on the formation of subsidence. This group of prediction methods is based on seven assumptions or principles which simplify the calculus and make the methods generally applicable. The principle of using the methods is to select the influential function for each mine and then determine the coefficients in order to ensure that the subsidence curve is similar to the form of the subsidence in nature.

The third group of prediction methods consists of the model prediction methods. Their origin is in mathematical–physical models. The behaviour of roof and the development of subsidence are calculated according to the laws of mechanics. The elastic and plastic models of subsidence belong to this group of prediction methods. When using these models, the problem is usually solved by numerical methods, such as the finite element method, the finite difference method or the boundary element method.

Based on results of the statistical analysis of a large amount of measured data in underground excavation engineering, the fuzzy genetic programming method (FGPM) of ground surface movements is given by using the theory of fuzzy probability measures and genetic programming (GP). And GP approach is proposed to determine the parameter of ground surface movements due to underground mining in this paper.

Section snippets

Mathematical models for analysis of ground movements

It is difficult to calculate the accurate movement of every point in a body of rock because of the complexity of the problem. Instead, various approximate methods have been used for this calculation. In recent years, in mining engineering in particular, theory of fuzzy mathematics has been applied to analyse the problems of ground surface movement due to underground mining [2], [4], [5], [10].

In fact, the movement of each point at a level of overburden can be regarded as a fuzzy event. In other

The GP approach to determine the parameters of ground movements

It is difficult to determine all the engineering parameters of ground movements due to underground mining, and it is even more difficult to determine their relative impacts. The engineering parameters can be determined by the artificial neural network (ANN) method [5], or by GP. In this research, the engineering parameters of ground movements are obtained by using the GP method.

GP is probably the most general approach of evolutionary computation methods [13]. GP can be viewed as an extension of

The process of estimating the displacements

In order to demonstrate the application of the method for the ground surface movements the engineering example of the practical application of the above theoretical results is given. Fig. 3 is a full flow chart with the steps in the method for estimating the movement values.

The flow chart of GP is given in Fig. 4. The training parameters (the parameters of the GP algorithm) are given in Table 1.

Determining subsidence factor k1

The engineering parameters can be determined by the GP method. Training samples and GP parameters are

Conclusions

In this paper, by applying the concepts of fuzzy probability measures and GP to actual cases of excavation, mining, ground surface movement have been analysed and the corresponding membership function established. And the engineering parameters for the ground surface movements are obtained by using the GP method. The approximate subsidence and horizontal displacement has been calculated and compared with the recorded data obtained from monitoring stations. The comparison shows that the

Acknowledgements

The support of this research work by a key project of science and technology from the Hebei province is gratefully acknowledged (No. 05213706). The project was supported by the research fund of the project of science and technology from the Educational Office of the Hebei Province is gratefully acknowledged (No. 2004308).

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (35)

  • Genetic programming and gene expression programming for flyrock assessment due to mine blasting

    2016, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    They estimated surface subsidence with a relative error of less than 10% that shows a high performance prediction of the GP. Li et al.36 developed the fuzzy genetic programming method (FGPM) for estimation of surface movement caused by the underground mining. A Linear Genetic Programming (LGP) model was developed by Baykasoglu et al.37 for estimation of tensile and compressive strengths of limestone samples.

  • On the topography influence on subsidence due to horizontal underground mining using the influence function method

    2014, Computers and Geotechnics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, they may require a long experimentation or computation time, usually several days or weeks for a physical model experiment and several hours or even days for a numerical simulation test (depending on the size of the models and the complexity of the geometry to be studied). Some researchers have tried to use new methods to compute subsidence such as fuzzy genetic programming methods [6], BP-neural networks [7] and so on. These works expand subsidence technology, but their reliability and accuracy require more in situ confirmation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text