Skip to main content

Developer Views on Software Carbon Footprint and Its Potential for Automated Reduction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Search-Based Software Engineering (SSBSE 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14415))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 268 Accesses

Abstract

Reducing software carbon footprint could contribute to efforts to avert climate change. Past research indicates that developers lack knowledge on energy consumption and carbon footprint, and existing reduction guidelines are difficult to apply. Therefore, we propose that automated reduction methods should be explored, e.g., through genetic improvement. However, such tools must be voluntarily adopted and regularly used to have an impact.

In this study, we have conducted interviews and a survey (a) to explore developers’ existing opinions, knowledge, and practices with regard to carbon footprint and energy consumption, and (b), to identify the requirements that automated reduction tools must meet to ensure adoption. Our findings offer a foundation for future research on practices, guidelines, and automated tools that address software carbon footprint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andrae, A.S.: New perspectives on internet electricity use in 2030. Eng. Appl. Sci. Lett. 3(2), 19–31 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bawdin, T.: Global warming: data centres to consume three times as much energy in next decade, experts warn. Independent 23, 276 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce, B.R., Petke, J., Harman, M.: Reducing energy consumption using genetic improvement. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1327–1334 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cruzes, D.S., Dyba, T.: Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 275–284. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De La Luz, V., Kandemir, M., Kolcu, I.: Automatic data migration for reducing energy consumption in multi-bank memory systems. In: Proceedings 2002 Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No. 02CH37324), pp. 213–218. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorn, J., Lacomis, J., Weimer, W., Forrest, S.: Automatically exploring tradeoffs between software output fidelity and energy costs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 45(3), 219–236 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgiou, S., Kechagia, M., Sharma, T., Sarro, F., Zou, Y.: Green AI: do deep learning frameworks have different costs? In: Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2022, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1082–1094. Association for Computing Machinery (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hao, K.: Training a single AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars in their lifetimes. MIT Technol. Rev. 75, 103 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lyu, H., Gay, G., Sakamoto, M.: Replication Data for “Developer Views on Software Carbon Footprint and its Potential for Automated Reduction, February 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7597662

  10. Manotas, I., Pollock, L., Clause, J.: Seeds: a software engineer’s energy-optimization decision support framework. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 503–514 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mrazek, V., Vasicek, Z., Sekanina, L.: Evolutionary approximation of software for embedded systems: median function. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 795–801 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ournani, Z., Rouvoy, R., Rust, P., Penhoat, J.: On reducing the energy consumption of software: from hurdles to requirements. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp. 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pang, C., Hindle, A., Adams, B., Hassan, A.E.: What do programmers know about software energy consumption? IEEE Softw. 33(3), 83–89 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinto, G., Castor, F., Liu, Y.D.: Mining questions about software energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 22–31 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sarro, F.: Search-based software engineering in the era of modern software systems. In: Proceedings of the 31st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. IEEE (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steinke, S., Wehmeyer, L., Lee, B.-S., Marwedel, P.: Assigning program and data objects to scratchpad for energy reduction. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, pp. 409–415. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taherdoost, H.: How to design and create an effective survey/questionnaire; a step by step guide. Int. J. Acad. Res. Manage. (IJARM) 5(4), 37–41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taina, J.: How green is your software? In: Tyrväinen, P., Jansen, S., Cusumano, M.A. (eds.) ICSOB 2010. LNBIP, vol. 51, pp. 151–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13633-7_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiagarajan, N., Aggarwal, G., Nicoara, A., Boneh, D., Singh, J.P.: Who killed my battery? Analyzing mobile browser energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 41–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. White, D.R., Clark, J., Jacob, J., Poulding, S.M.: Searching for resource-efficient programs: low-power pseudorandom number generators. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1775–1782 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wiedmann, T., Minx, J.: A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecol. Econ. Res. Trends 1(2008), 1–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, Y., Reddi, V.J.: High-performance and energy-efficient mobile web browsing on big/little systems. In: 2013 IEEE 19th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), pp. 13–24. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Gay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lyu, H., Gay, G., Sakamoto, M. (2024). Developer Views on Software Carbon Footprint and Its Potential for Automated Reduction. In: Arcaini, P., Yue, T., Fredericks, E.M. (eds) Search-Based Software Engineering. SSBSE 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14415. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48796-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48796-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48795-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48796-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics