Analysis and Prediction of Residual Stresses in Nitrided Tool Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Plasma nitriding is a thermo-chemical process of high importance for engineering components, which through generation of near-surface compressive residual stresses significantly improves wear and fatigue resistance. A precise knowledge of the level and distribution of residual stresses that exist in surface engineered components is necessary for accurate prediction of a component’s fatigue resistance. However, measurement of residual stress is not always possible, especially in the case of industrial tools and dies. Therefore, other methods for residual stress evaluation and prediction are required by industry. Results of this investigation show that residual stress level and depth in plasma nitrided tool steel increase by nitriding time and temperature. On the other hand, experimental data show that residual steel distribution in plasma nitrided tool steels can be determined on the basis of microhardness depth distribution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

352-357

Citation:

Online since:

March 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] S.Y. Sirin, K. Sirin and E. Kaluc: Materials Characterization Vol. 59 (2008), 351-358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.01.019

Google Scholar

[2] B. Edenhofer: Heat Treatment of Metals Vol. 1 (1974), 23-28.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Bell and N.L. Loh: Journal of Heat Treatment Vol. 2 (1982), 232-237.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Zurn, C. Razim and J. Gosch: The effect of residual stress in case hardening, 6th International Congress on Heat Treatment of Materials, ASM International, Chichago, USA (1988), 279-287.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Ruud, in: Handbook of Residual Stresses and Deformation of Steel, edited by G. Totten, M. Howes, T. Inoue, Measurement of Residual Stresses, ASM International (2002), 99-117.

Google Scholar

[6] P.J. Withers, M. Turski, L. Edwards, P.J. Bouchard and D.J. Buttle: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Vol. 85 (2008), 118-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.007

Google Scholar

[7] J. Frankel and W. Scholz: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Vol. 6 (1986), 1577-1584.

Google Scholar

[8] V. Leskovšek, B. Podgornik and D. Nolan, Materials Characterization Vol. 59 (2008), 454-461.

Google Scholar

[9] ASM E 837-01 Standard: Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole Drilling Strain-Gage Method, ASTM (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Kockelmann and Th. Schwarz: Vergleich praktizierter Auswerteverfahren der Bohrlochmethode, GESA Kolloquium, Köln, Germany (1993).

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Kolozsvary, in: Handbook of Residual Stresses and Deformation of Steel, edited by G. Totten, M. Howes, T. Inoue, Residual Stresses in Nitriding, ASM International (2002), 209-219.

Google Scholar

[12] M.B. Karamis and A.M. Staines, Heat Treatment of Metals Vol. 3 (1989), 79-82.

Google Scholar

[13] J.R. Koza: Genetic Programming III (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco 1999).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Kovačič, P. Uratnik, M. Brezočnik and R. Turk: Materials and Manufacturing Processes Vol. 22 (2007), 634-640.

Google Scholar