Skip to main content

Analysing Psychological Data by Evolving Computational Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Analysis of Large and Complex Data

Abstract

We present a system to represent and discover computational models to capture data in psychology. The system uses a Theory Representation Language to define the space of possible models. This space is then searched using genetic programming (GP), to discover models which best fit the experimental data. The aim of our semi-automated system is to analyse psychological data and develop explanations of underlying processes. Some of the challenges include: capturing the psychological experiment and data in a way suitable for modelling, controlling the kinds of models that the GP system may develop, and interpreting the final results. We discuss our current approach to all three challenges, and provide results from two different examples, including delayed-match-to-sample and visual attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chao, L., Haxby, J., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Martinez, E., & Gobet, F. (2007). Automatic generation of cognitive theories using genetic programming. Minds and Machines, 17, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobet, F., Chassy, P., & Bilalić, M. (2011). Foundations of cognitive psychology. London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habeck, C., Hilton, J., Zarahn, E., Flynn, J., Moeller, J., & Stern, Y. (2003). Relation of cognitive reserve and task performance to expression of regional covariance networks in an event-related fMRI study of non-verbal memory. NeuroImage, 20, 1723–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S. (1969). Sequential determinants of information processing in serial and discrete choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 76(2), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. New York: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. C. R., & Gobet, F. (2012). A theory-driven testing methodology for developing scientific software. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 24, 421–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. C. R., Sozou, P. D., Addis, M., & Gobet, F. (2014). Evolving process-based models from psychological data using genetic programming. In R. Kibble (Ed.), Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Convention of the AISB (pp. 144–149).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G., & Zytkow, J. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, S. (2013). The ECJ owner’s manual. http://cs.gmu.edu/ eclab/projects/ecj/docs/manual/ manual.pdf

  • Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247), 335–341.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R., Langdon, W. B., & McPhee, M. F. (2008). A field guide to genetic programming. Raleigh, USA, Lulu Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samsonovich, A.V. (2010). Toward a unified catalog of implemented cognitive architectures. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures (pp. 195–244). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009). Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science, 324(5923), 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ESRC Grant ES/L003090/1.

The implementation was written for the Java 7 platform in the Fantom language, and used the ECJ evolutionary computing library (Luke 2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter C. R. Lane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lane, P.C.R., Sozou, P.D., Gobet, F., Addis, M. (2016). Analysing Psychological Data by Evolving Computational Models. In: Wilhelm, A., Kestler, H. (eds) Analysis of Large and Complex Data. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25226-1_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics