Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An enhanced Huffman-PSO based image optimization algorithm for image steganography

  • Published:
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is crucial in the field of image steganography to find an algorithm for hiding information by using various combinations of compression techniques. The primary factors in this research are maximizing the capacity and improving the quality of the image. The image quality cannot be compromised up to a certain level as it breaks the concept of steganography by getting distorted visibly. The second primary factor is maximizing the data-carrying/embedding capacity, which makes the use of this technique more efficient. In this paper, we are proposing an image steganography tool by using Huffman Encoding and Particle Swarm Optimization, which will improve the performance of the information hiding scheme and improve overall efficiency. The combinational technique of Huffman PSO not only offers higher information embedment capabilities but also maintains the image quality. The experimental analysis and results on cover images along with different sizes of secret messages validate that the proposed HPSO scheme has superior results using parameters Peak-Signal-to-Noise-Ratio, Mean Square Error, Bit Error Rate, and Structural Similarity Index. It is also robust against statistical attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

6 References

  1. FA.HD. Mohsen, M. Hadhoud, K. Mostafa, K. Amin, (2012) A new image segmentation method based on particle swarm optimization. Int. Arab J Inform Technol, 9(5)

  2. A. Aggarwal, S.K. Patra, Performance perdiction of OFDM based digital audio broadcasting system using channel protection mechanisms. Int. Conf. Electron. Comp. Technol 2, 57–61 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.K. Sabnis, R.N. Awale, Statistical steganalysis of high capacity image steganography with cryptography. Proc. Comput. Sci. 79, 321–327 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Jain, S.K. Lenkab, S.K. Vasisthaa, Adaptive circular queue image steganography with RSA cryptosystem. Perspect. Sci. 8, 417–420 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.U. Mahaeshwari, D.J. Hemanth, Performance enhanced image steganography systems using transforms and optimization techniques. Multimedia Tools Application (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3035-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Hong, T.S. Chen, Reversible data embedding for high-quality images using interpolation and reference pixel distribution mechanism. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 22, 131–140 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Sharif, M. Mollaeefar, M. Nazari, A novel method for digital image steganography based on a new three-dimensional chaotic map. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76(6), 7849–7867 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3398-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M.S. Subehdar, V.H. Mankar, Image steganography using redundant discrete wavelet transform and QR factorization. Comput. Electr. Eng. 54, 406–422 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Yan, G. Tang, Y. Chen, Incorporating data hiding into G. 729 speech codec. Multimed. Tools Appl. 75(18), 493–512 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Swain, Digital image steganography using variable length group of bits substitution. Proc Comput Sci 85, 31–38 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Dewangan, M. Sharma, S. Bera, Development and analysis of stego image using discrete wavelet transform. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2(1), 142–148 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Pradhan, A. K. Sahu, G. Swain, K. R. Sekhar, Performance evaluation parameters of image steganography techniques, Proceedings of International Conference on Research Advances in Integerated Navigation Systems, 1–8, 2016

  13. Z.T.M. Al-Ta’i, E.R. Mohammad, Comparison between PSO and HPSO in Image Steganography. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 15(8), 161–168 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.I. Nipanikar, V. Hima Deepthi, N. Kulkarni, A sparse representation based image steganography using Particle Swarm Optimization and Wavelet transform. Alex. Eng. J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Miri, K. Faez, Adaptive image steganography based on transform domain via genetic algorithm. Optik-Int. J. Light Electron Otics (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.07.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Rajeswari, P. Shwetha, S. Purushothaman (2017, March) Application of wavelet and particle swarm optimization in steganography. In 2017 2nd International Conference on Anti-Cyber Crimes (ICACC) (pp. 129–132). https://doi.org/10.1109/Anti-Cybercrime.2017.7905277

  17. I. Hamid, Image steganography based on discrete wavelet transform and chaotic map. Int. J. Sci. Res. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20179396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Khari, A.K. Garg, R.G. Crespo, E. Verdú, Gesture recognition of RGB and RGB-D static images using convolutional neural networks. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 5(7), 22 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Gupta, M. Khari, D. Gupta, R.G. Crespo, Fingerprint image enhancement and reconstruction using the orientation and phase reconstruction. Inf. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.01.031

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Gupta, M. Khari, V. Gupta, E. Verdú, X. Wu, E. Herrera-Viedma, R. González Crespo, Fast single image haze removal method for inhomogeneous environment using variable scattering coefficient. Comput. Modeling Eng. Sci. 123(3), 1175–1192 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Khari, A. Sinha, E. Verdu, R.G. Crespo, Performance analysis of six meta-heuristic algorithms over automated test suite generation for path coverage-based optimization. Soft Comput. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04444-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Khari, P. Kumar, D. Burgos, R.G. Crespo, Optimized test suites for automated testing using different optimization techniques. Soft Comput. 22(24), 8341–8352 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Mohsen, M.M. Hadhoud, K. Moustafa, K. Ameen, A new image segmentation method based on particle swarm optimization. Int. Arab J. Inform. Technol. 9(5), 487–493 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. http://sipi.usc.edu/database/-The USC-SIPI Image Database

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GD Goenka University, Gurugram, 122103, India

    Neha Sharma & Usha Batra

Authors
  1. Neha Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Usha Batra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Sharma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, N., Batra, U. An enhanced Huffman-PSO based image optimization algorithm for image steganography. Genet Program Evolvable Mach 22, 189–205 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-020-09396-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-020-09396-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation