Skip to main content

Program Synthesis with Genetic Programming: The Influence of Batch Sizes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Genetic Programming (EuroGP 2022)

Abstract

Genetic programming is a method to generate computer programs automatically for a given set of input/output examples that define the user’s intent. In real-world software development this method could also be used, as a programmer could first define the input/output examples for a certain problem and then let genetic programming generate the functional source code. However, a prerequisite for using genetic programming as support system in real-world software development is a high performance and generalizability of the generated programs. For some program synthesis benchmark problems, however, the generalizability to previously unseen test cases is low especially when lexicase is used as parent selection method. Therefore, we combine in this paper lexicase selection with small batches of training cases and study the influence of different batch sizes on the program synthesis performance and the generalizability of programs generated with genetic programming. For evaluation, we use three common program synthesis benchmark problems. We find that the selection pressure can be reduced even when small batch sizes are used. Moreover, we find that, compared to standard lexicase selection, the obtained success rates on the test set are similar or even better when combining lexicase with small batches. Furthermore, also the generalizability of the found solutions can often be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Grammars: https://gitlab.rlp.net/dsobania/progsys-grammars-2022-1.

References

  1. Aenugu, S., Spector, L.: Lexicase selection in learning classifier systems. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 356–364 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beck, K.: Test-driven Development: by Example. Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cramer, N.L.: A representation for the adaptive generation of simple sequential programs. In: Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and the Applications, pp. 183–187 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Melo, V.V., Vargas, D.V., Banzhaf, W.: Batch tournament selection for genetic programming: the quality of lexicase, the speed of tournament. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 994–1002 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deglman, J.: Summed batch lexicase selection on software synthesis problems. Scholarly Horizons: Univ. Minnesota, Morris Undergraduate J. 7(1), 3 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fagan, D., Fenton, M., O’Neill, M.: Exploring position independent initialisation in grammatical evolution. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 5060–5067. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenton, M., McDermott, J., Fagan, D., Forstenlechner, S., Hemberg, E., O’Neill, M.: PonyGE2: Grammatical evolution in Python. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 1194–1201 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forstenlechner, S., Fagan, D., Nicolau, M., O’Neill, M.: A grammar design pattern for arbitrary program synthesis problems in genetic programming. In: McDermott, J., Castelli, M., Sekanina, L., Haasdijk, E., García-Sánchez, P. (eds.) EuroGP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10196, pp. 262–277. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55696-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Forstenlechner, S., Fagan, D., Nicolau, M., O’Neill, M.: Extending program synthesis grammars for grammar-guided genetic programming. In: Auger, A., Fonseca, C.M., Lourenço, N., Machado, P., Paquete, L., Whitley, D. (eds.) PPSN 2018. LNCS, vol. 11101, pp. 197–208. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Helmuth, T., Abdelhady, A.: Benchmarking parent selection for program synthesis by genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 237–238 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Helmuth, T., Kelly, P.: PSB2: the second program synthesis benchmark suite. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 785–794 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: The impact of hyperselection on lexicase selection. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016, pp. 717–724 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: Lexicase selection for program synthesis: a diversity analysis. In: Riolo, R., Worzel, B., Kotanchek, M., Kordon, A. (eds.) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIII. GEC, pp. 151–167. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34223-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: Program synthesis using uniform mutation by addition and deletion. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1127–1134 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helmuth, T., Pantridge, E., Spector, L.: Lexicase selection of specialists. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1030–1038 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Helmuth, T., Pantridge, E., Spector, L.: On the importance of specialists for lexicase selection. Genetic Program. Evol. Mach. 21(3), 349–373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-020-09377-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helmuth, T., Spector, L.: General program synthesis benchmark suite. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1039–1046 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helmuth, T., Spector, L.: Explaining and exploiting the advantages of down-sampled lexicase selection. In: Artificial Life Conference Proceedings, pp. 341–349. MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142–1209 USA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hernandez, J.G., Lalejini, A., Dolson, E., Ofria, C.: Random subsampling improves performance in lexicase selection. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 2028–2031 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jundt, L., Helmuth, T.: Comparing and combining lexicase selection and novelty search. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1047–1055 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, J., Hemberg, E., O’Reilly, U.-M.: Improving genetic programming with novel exploration - exploitation control. In: Sekanina, L., Hu, T., Lourenço, N., Richter, H., García-Sánchez, P. (eds.) EuroGP 2019. LNCS, vol. 11451, pp. 64–80. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16670-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection, vol. 1. MIT press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saini, A.K., Spector, L.: Effect of parent selection methods on modularity. In: Hu, T., Lourenço, N., Medvet, E., Divina, F. (eds.) Genetic Programming, pp. 184–194. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobania, D.: On the generalizability of programs synthesized by grammar-guided genetic programming. In: Hu, T., Lourenço, N., Medvet, E. (eds.) EuroGP 2021. LNCS, vol. 12691, pp. 130–145. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72812-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobania, D., Rothlauf, F.: A generalizability measure for program synthesis with genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 822–829 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sobania, D., Schweim, D., Rothlauf, F.: Recent developments in program synthesis with evolutionary algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.12227 (2021)

  27. Spector, L.: Assessment of problem modality by differential performance of lexicase selection in genetic programming: a preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 401–408 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Sobania .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sobania, D., Rothlauf, F. (2022). Program Synthesis with Genetic Programming: The Influence of Batch Sizes. In: Medvet, E., Pappa, G., Xue, B. (eds) Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13223. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02056-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02056-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-02055-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-02056-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics