skip to main content
10.1145/2739480.2754675acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Genetic Programming for Estimation of Heat Flux between the Atmosphere and Sea Ice in Polar Regions

Published:11 July 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Earth surface and atmosphere exchange heat via turbulent fluxes. An accurate description of the heat exchange is essential in modelling the weather and climate. In these models the heat fluxes are described applying the Monin-Obukhov similarity theory, where the flux depends on the air-surface temperature difference and wind speed. The theory makes idealized assumptions and the resulting estimates often have large errors. This is the case particularly in conditions when the air is warmer than the Earth surface, i.e., the atmospheric boundary layer is stably stratified, and turbulence is therefore weak. This is a common situation over snow and ice in the Arctic and Antarctic. In this paper, we present alternative models for heat flux estimation evolved by means of genetic programming (GP). To this aim, we utilize the best heat flux data collected in the Arctic and Antarctic sea ice zones. We obtain GP models that are more accurate, robust, and conceptually novel from the viewpoint of meteorology. Contrary to the Monin-Obukhov theory, the GP equations are not solely based on the air-surface temperature difference and wind speed, but include also radiative fluxes that improve the performance of the method. These results open the door to a new class of approaches to heat flux prediction with potential applications in weather and climate models.

References

  1. E. L. Andreas, R. E. Jordan, and A. P. Makshtas. Parameterizing turbulent exchange over sea ice: The Ice Station Weddell results. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 114:439--460, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Evgeny Atlaskin and Timo Vihma. Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 138(667):1440--1451, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. D. J. Cavalieri and C. L. Parkinson. Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979--2010. The Cryosphere, 6(4):881--889, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on, 6(2):182 --197, apr 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Derksen and R. Brown. Spring snow cover extent reductions in the 2008--2012 period exceeding climate model projections. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(19), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Döscher, T. Vihma, and E. Maksimovich. Recent advances in understanding the Arctic climate system state and change from a sea ice perspective: a review. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(24):13571--13600, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. John R. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Krzysztof Krawiec and Una-May O'Reilly. Behavioral programming: A broader and more detailed take on semantic GP. In Proceeding of the sixteenth annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference, GECCO '14, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sean Luke. ECJ evolutionary computation system, 2002. (http://cs.gmu.edu/ eclab/projects/ecj/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Mahrt. Stably stratified boundary layer. In J. P. Holton, J. A. Curry, and J. Pyle, editors, Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, pages 298--305. Academic Press, London, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. S. Monin and A. M. Obukhov. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere (in Russian). Tr. Akad. Nauk SSSR Geofiz. Inst., 24:163--187, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Ola G. Persson, Christopher W. Fairall, Edgar L. Andreas, Peter S. Guest, and Donald K. Perovich. Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower at SHEBA: Near-surface conditions and surface energy budget. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 107(C10):SHE 21--1-SHE 21--35, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. D. Shupe and J. M. Intrieri. Cloud radiative forcing of the Arctic surface: the influence of cloud properties, surface albedo, and solar zenith angle. Journal of Climate, 17:616--628, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Karolina Stanislawska, Krzysztof Krawiec, and Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz. Modelling global temperature changes with genetic programming. Computer & Mathematics with Applications, 64(12):3717--3728, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. Svensson, A.A.M. Holtslag, V. Kumar, T. Mauritsen, G.J. Steeneveld, W.M. Angevine, E. Bazile, A. Beljaars, E.I.F. de Bruijn, A. Cheng, L. Conangla, J. Cuxart, M. Ek, M.J. Falk, F. Freedman, H. Kitagawa, V.E. Larson, A. Lock, J. Mailhot, V. Masson, S. Park, J. Pleim, S. Söderberg, W. Weng, and M. Zampieri. Evaluation of the diurnal cycle in the atmospheric boundary layer over land as represented by a variety of single-column models: the second GABLS experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 140(2):177--206, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Tjernström, M. Zagar, G. Svensson, J.J. Cassano, S. Pfeifer, A. Rinke, K. Wyser, K. Dethloff, C. Jones, T. Semmler, and M. Shaw. Modelling the Arctic boundary layer: an evaluation of six ARCMIP regional-scale models using data from the SHEBA project. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 117:337--381, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. T. Vihma, R. Pirazzini, I. Fer, I. A. Renfrew, J. Sedlar, M. Tjernström, C. Lüpkes, T. Nygård, D. Notz, J. Weiss, D. Marsan, B. Cheng, G. Birnbaum, S. Gerland, D. Chechin, and J. C. Gascard. Advances in understanding and parameterization of small-scale physical processes in the marine Arctic climate system: a review. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(17):9403--9450, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Genetic Programming for Estimation of Heat Flux between the Atmosphere and Sea Ice in Polar Regions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
        July 2015
        1496 pages
        ISBN:9781450334723
        DOI:10.1145/2739480

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 July 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        GECCO '15 Paper Acceptance Rate182of505submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader