Abstract
This paper compares two grammar based Evolutionary Automatic Programming methods, Grammatical Evolution (GE) and Chorus. Both systems evolve sequences of derivation rules which can be used to produce computer programs, however, Chorus employs a position independent representation, while GE uses polymorphic codons, the meaning of which depends on the context in which they are used.
We consider issues such as the order in which rules appear in individuals, and demonstrate that an order always emerges with Chorus, which is similar to that of GE, but more flexible.
The paper also examines the final step of evolution, that is, how perfect individuals are produced, and how they differ from their immediate neighbours.
We demonstrate that, although Chorus appears to be more flexible structure-wise, GE tends to produce individuals with a higher neutrality, suggesting that its representation can, in some cases, make finding the perfect solution easier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Azad, R.M.A., Ryan C., Burke, M.E., and Ansari, A.R., A re-examination of The Cart Centering Problem using The Chorus System. In the proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), 2002 (pp. 707–715), Morgan Koffman, NYC, NY, 2002.
Freeman, J.J., “A Linear Representation for GP using Context Free Grammars” in Genetic Programming 1998: Proc. 3rd Annu. Conf., J.R. Koza, W. Banzhaf, K. Chellapilla, K. Deb, M. Dorigo, D.B. Fogel, M.H. Garzon, D.E. Goldberg, H. Iba, R.L. Riolo, Eds. Madison, Wisconsin: MIT Press, 1998, pp. 72–77.
Keller, R. and Banzhaf, W., “GP using mutation, reproduction and genotype-phenotype mapping from linear binary genomes into linear LALR phenotypes” in Genetic Programming 1996: Proc. 1st Annu. Conf., J.R. Koza, D.E. Goldberg, D.B. Fogel, and R.L. Riolo, Eds. Stanford, CA: MIT Press 1996, pp. 116–122.
Koza, J.R., Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
Paterson, N., and Livesey, M., “Evolving caching algorithms in C by GP” in Genetic Programming 1997: Proc. 2nd Annu. Conf., MIT Press, 1997, pp. 262–267. MIT Press.
O’Neill M. and Ryan C. Grammatical Evolution. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2001.
O’Sullivan, J., and Ryan, C., An Investigation into the Use of Different Search Strategies with Grammatical Evolution. In the proceedings of European Conference on Genetic Programming (EuroGP2002) (pp. 268–277), Springer, 2002.
Ryan, C., Azad, A., Sheahan, A., and O’Neill, M., No Coercion and No Prohibition, A Position Independent Encoding Scheme for Evolutionary Algorithms — The Chorus System. In the Proceedings of European Conference on Genetic Programming (EuroGP 2002) (pp. 131–141), Springer, 2002.
Ryan, C., Collins, J.J., and O’Neill, M., Grammatical Evolution: Evolving Programs for an Arbitrary Language, in EuroGP’98: Proc. of the First European Workshop on Genetic Programming (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1391, pp. 83–95), Springer, Paris, France, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Azad, R.M.A., Ryan, C. (2003). Structural Emergence with Order Independent Representations. In: Cantú-Paz, E., et al. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation — GECCO 2003. GECCO 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45110-2_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45110-2_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40603-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45110-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive