Skip to main content

Challenges in Open-Ended Problem Solving with Genetic Programming

  • Chapter
Genetic Programming Theory and Practice III

Part of the book series: Genetic Programming ((GPEM,volume 9))

  • 881 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes how genetic programming might be integrated as a tool into the human context of discovery. To accomplish this, a comparison is made between GP and a well-regarded strategy in open-ended problem solving. The comparison indicates which tasks and skills are likely to be complemented by GP. Furthermore, the comparison also indicates directions in research that may need to be taken for GP to be further leveraged as a tool that assists discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Caplan, M. and Y. Beker (2004). Lessons Learned Using Genetic Programming in a Stock Picking Context: A Story of Willful Optimism and Eventual Success. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo and W. Worzel. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, F., A. Kordon, et al. (2004). Using Genetic Programming in Industrial Statistical Model Building. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo, and W. Worzel. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daida, J. M. (2004). What Makes a Problem GP-Hard? A Look at How Structure Affects Content. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice. R. L. Riolo and W. Worzel. New York, Springer: 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daida, J. M. (2005). Considering the Roles of Structure in Problem-Solving by Computer. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo and W. Worzel. New York, Springer: 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daida, J. M. (2005). Towards Identifying Populations that Increase the Likelihood of Success in Genetic Programming. GECCO 2005. In print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daida, J. M., A. M. Hilss, et al. (2005). “Visualizing Tree Structures in Genetic Programming.” Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 6: 79–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. (2002). The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M. A., J. R. Koza, et al. (2002). General-Purpose Controllers. Patent #6,847,851. Issued 25 January 2005. U. S. Patent Office. United States. Assignee: Koza, J.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., F. H. Bennett III, et al. (1999). Genetic Programming III Darwinian Invention and Problem Solving. San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., L. W. Jones, et al. (2004). Toward Automated Design of Industrial-Strength Analog Circuits by Means of Genetic Programming. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo, and W. Worzel. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., M. A. Keane, et al. (2003). Genetic Programming IV: Routine Human-Competitive Machine Intelligence. Norwell, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J. R., M. A. Keane, et al. (2000). “Automatic Creation of Human-Competitive Programs and Controllers by Means of Genetic Programming.” Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 1(1/2): 121–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, H. and J. B. Pollack (2000). “Automatic Design and Manufacture of Robotic Lifeforms.” Nature 406 (31 August 2000): 974–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohn, J. D., G. S. Hornby, et al. (2004). An Evolved Antenna for Deployment on NASA’s Space Technology 5 Mission. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo, and W. Worzel. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, D., E. A. Wollesen, et al. (2004). Listening to Data: Tuning a Genetic Programming System. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II. U.-M. O’Reilly, T. Yu, R. L. Riolo, and W. Worzel. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz, Z. and D. B. Fogel (2000). How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, R. L. (2002). Testimony of Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director, Office of Science, Before the House Science Committee Subcommittee on Energy. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (2003). How Would You Move Mount Fuji? Microsoft’s Cult of the Puzzle: How the World’s Smartest Companies Select the Most Creative Thinkers. Boston, Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering: Inventing and Solving Problems at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triendl, R. (2002). “Our Virtual Planet.” Nature 416 (11 April 2002): 579–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. R. (1994). Problem-Based Learning: How to Gain the Most from PBL. Waterdown, ON, Woods Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. R. (2000). “An Evidence-Based Strategy for Problem Solving.” Journal of Engineering Education: 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. R., A. Hrymak, et al. (1997). “Developing Problem Solving Skills: The McMaster Problem Solving Program.” Journal of Engineering Education: 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daida, J.M. (2006). Challenges in Open-Ended Problem Solving with Genetic Programming. In: Yu, T., Riolo, R., Worzel, B. (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice III. Genetic Programming, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28111-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28111-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28110-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28111-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics