Skip to main content

A Genetic Programming-based Hierarchical Clustering Procedure for the solution of the Cell-Formation Problem

  • Conference paper
Evolutionary Design and Manufacture
  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

Cellular manufacturing is the implementation of group technology in the manufacturing process. A key issue during the design of a cellular manufacturing system is the configuration of machine cells and part families within the plant. In this paper we present a hierarchical clustering procedure for the solution of the cell-formation problem which is based on the use of Genetic Programming for the evolution of similarity coefficients between pairs of machines in the plant. The performance of the methodology is illustrated on a number of test problems taken from the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mitrovanov, S.P., 1966. The Scientific Principles of Group Technology, National Lending Library Translation, Boston Spa, Yorkshire, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Koza, J.R., 1992. Genetic Programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press. Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimopoulos, C., and Zalzala AMS., 1999. Recent developments in evolutionary computation for manufacturing optimisation: problems, solutions and comparisons. IEEE Transactions in Evolutionary Computation, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burbidge, J.L., 1971. Production Flow Analysis. Production Engineer50: 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, N., 1993. Cellular manufacturing systems: an invited review. European Journal of Operational Research69: 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Offodile, O.F., Mehrez, A., and Grznar, J., 1994. Cellular manufacturing: a taxonomic review framework. Journal of Maniefacturing Systems13: 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Selim, M.H., Askin, R.G., and Vakharia, A.J., 1998. Cell formation in group technology: review, evaluation and directions for future research. Computers & Industrial Engineering34: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McAuley, J., 1972. Machine grouping for efficient production. Production Engineer 51:53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharker, B.R., 1986. The resemblance coeficients in group technology: a survey and comparative study of relational metrics. Computers & Industrial Engineering30: 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, C.S., and Chandrasekharan, M.P., 1990. Grouping efficacy: a quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal forms of binary matrices in group technology. Int.J. of Production Research28: 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chandrasekharan, M.P., and Rajagopalan, R., 1989. GROUPABILITY: an analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology. Int.J. of Production Research27: 1035–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, K.R., and Vannelli, A., 1987. Strategic subcontrcting for efficient disaggregated manufacturing. Int.J. of Production Research25: 1715–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seifoddini, H., 1989. Single linkage vs. average linkage clustering in machine cells formation application. Computers & Industrial Engineering16: 419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanfel, L.E., 1985. Machine clustering for economic production”, Engineering Costs & Production Economics9: 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chandrasekharan, M.P., and Rajagopalan, R., 1987. ZODIAC-an algorithm for concurrent formation of part families and machine-cells. Int.J. of Production Research25: 835–850.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasan, G, and Narendran, T.T., 1991. GRAFICS-a nonhierarchical clustering algorithm for group technology. Int.J. of Production Research29: 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, C.H., Gupta, Y.P., Lee, W.H., and Wong, K.F., 1998. A TSP-based heuristic for forming machine groups and part families. Int.J. of Production Research36: 13251–337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dimopoulos, C., Mort, N. (2000). A Genetic Programming-based Hierarchical Clustering Procedure for the solution of the Cell-Formation Problem. In: Parmee, I.C. (eds) Evolutionary Design and Manufacture. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0519-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0519-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-300-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0519-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics