Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-gene genetic programming model for estimating stress-dependent soil water retention curves

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil water retention curve (SWRC) is an important parameter required for seepage modelling in unsaturated soil and is used for analysing rainfall-induced slope failures, design of waste contaminant liners and cover, etc. The influence of stress, which is one of constitutive variables that governs unsaturated soil behaviour on the SWRC, has been well recognised by researchers. Stress is essential for study as it drastically alters the soil fabric which includes macropores, minipores and micropores and thus affects the ability of soil to retain water. Various computational modelling techniques that formulate models based on existing databases such as UNSODA, ISRIC and HYPRES for the estimation of SWRC do not take into account the stress influence on soil behaviour. In the present work, three artificial intelligence (AI) methods of support vector regression, artificial neural network and multi-gene genetic programming (MGGP) have been applied to formulate the mathematical relationship between the water content and input variables such as stress and suction (i.e. stress-dependent soil water characteristic curves (SDSWRCs)). The results indicate that the MGGP model outperforms the other two models and is able to extrapolate the water content values satisfactorily along the stress value of 800 kPa. This MGGP model can then be deployed by experts for the estimation of SDSWRCs, thus eliminating the need for conducting costly and time-consuming experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Biddle, P.G.: Tree root damage to buildings. In: Causes, Diagnosis and Remedy, vol. 1. Willowmead, Wantage (1998)

  2. Biddle, P.G.: Tree root damage to buildings. In: Patterns of Soil Drying in Proximity to Trees on Clay Soils, vol. 2. Willowmead, Wantage (1998)

  3. Blight, G.E.: Desiccation of a clay by grass, bushes and trees. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 23(6), 697–720 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fredlund, D.G., Morgenstern, N.R.: Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 103, 447–466 (1977). ASCE 12919

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, J., Sun, D.A., Sheng, D., Sloan, S., Fredlund, D.: Preliminary study on soil water characteristics of Maryland clay. In: Yin, Z.Z., Yuan, J.P., Chiu, A.C.F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Nanjing, China, pp. 569–574. Science Press, Beijing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J.Y., Yang, Q., Li, P.Y., Yang, Q.L.: Experimental research on soil-water characteristic curve of remolded residual soils. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 14, 1–12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nowamooz, H., Masrouri, F.: Relationships between soil fabric and suction cycles in compacted swelling soils. Eng. Geol. 114(3), 444–455 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malaya, C., Sreedeep, S.: Critical review on the parameters influencing soil-water characteristic curve. J. Irrig. Drainage Eng. 138(1), 55–62 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkady, T.Y., Al-Mahbashi, A.M.: Effect of vertical stress on the soil water characteristic curve of highly expansive soils. In: Unsaturated Soils: Research and Applications, pp 165–172. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, J.K.: Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. Wiley, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garg, A., Malaya, C., Sreedeep, S.: A study on the influence of soil-water characteristic curve on the seepage modeling of unsaturated soil. In: International Conference on Advances in Concrete, Structural, and Geotechnical Engineering, BITS Pilani (2009)

  12. Garg, A., Malaya, C., Sreedeep, S.: A study on the influence of soil-water characteristic curve on the seepage modeling of unsaturated soil. Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng. 3(2), 40–46 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garg, A., Malaya, C., Sreedeep, S.: Influence of different suction measuring procedures on SWCC and seepage modeling in unsaturated soils. In: Proceedings of 6ICEG (International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics), New Delhi, pp. 1605–1608. Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi (2010)

  14. Gupta, S., Larson, W.E.: Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density. Water Resour. Res. 15(6), 1633–1635 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L.: Estimation of soil-water retention and hydraulic properties. In: Morel-Seytoux, H.J. (ed.) Unsaturated Flow in Hydrologic Modeling Theory and Practice, pp 275–300. Kluwer, Beltsville (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L.: Prediction of soil water properties for hydrologic modeling. In: Jones, E.B., Ward, T.J. (eds.) Watershed Management in the Eighties, Proceedings of a Symposium Sponsored by the Committee on Watershed Management, I & D Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Denver, CO, pp 293–299. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vereecken, H., Maes, J., Feyen, J., Darius, P.: Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content. Soil Sci. 148(6), 389–403 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scheinost, A.C., Sinowski, W., Auerswald, K.: Regionalization of soil-water retention curves in a highly variable soilscape, I. Developing a new pedo-transfer function. Geoderma 78, 129–143 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arya, L.M., Leij, F.J., van Genuchten, M.Th., Shouse, P.J.: Scaling parameter to predict the soil-water characteristic from particle-size distribution data. Soil Sci. Soc. America J. 63, 510–519 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pachepsky, Y.A., Timlin, D., Varallyay, G.: Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data. Soil Sci. Society America J. 60(3), 727–733 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pachepsky, Y.A., Rawls, W.J.: Development of Pedotransfer Functions in Soil Hydrology, vol. 30, pp 1–512. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schaap, M.G., Bouten, W.: Modeling water retention curves of sandy soils using neural networks. Water Resour. Res. 32(10), 3033–3040 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J.: Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Tillage Res. 47(1), 37–42 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaap, M.G., Leij, F.J.: Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the Mualem-van Genuchten model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64(3), 843–851 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamari, S., Wösten, J.HM., Ruiz-Suarez, J.C.: Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60(6), 1732–1741 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B.: A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput Geosci. 32(9), 1378–1388 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, W.G., Goh, A.TC.: Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems. Comput Geotech. 48, 82–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leij, F.J., Alves, W.J., van Genuchten, M.T., Williams, J.R.: The UNSODA Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Database, version 1.0. EPA Report, EPA/600, 96, 095. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, Oklahoma (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tempel, P., Batjes, N.H., van Engelen, V.WP.: IGBP-DIS Soil Data Set for Pedotransfer Function Development. International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Madár, J., Abonyi, J., Szeifert, F.: Genetic programming for the identification of nonlinear input-output models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 3178–3186 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, B., Yao, M., Zhu, R.: Gene expression programming with multiple chromosomes. Int. J. Model. Identif. Control. 14, 235–241 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koza, J.R.: Genetic Programming. II: Automatic Discovery of Reusable Programs. MIT, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Garg, A., Bhalerao, Y., Tai, K.: Review of empirical modelling techniques for modelling of turning process. Int. J. Modelling, Identification Control. 20(2), 121–129 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garg, A., Rachmawati L, Tai, K.: Classification-driven model selection approach of genetic programming in modelling of turning process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2013, in press). doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5103-x

  35. Garg, A., Savalani, M.M., Tai, K.: State-of-the-art in empirical modelling of rapid prototyping processes. Rapid Prototyp. J. (2013, in press)

  36. Garg, A., Sriram, S., Tai, K.: Empirical analysis of model selection criteria for genetic programming in modeling of time series system. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr), Singapore, pp. 84–88 (2013)

  37. Garg, A., Tai, K.: Selection of a robust experimental design for the effective modeling of the nonlinear systems using genetic programming. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data mining (CIDM), Singapore, pp. 293–298 (2013)

  38. Garg, A., Tai, K.: Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods in modelling of data with multicollinearity. Int. J. Model. Identif. Control. 18(4), 295–312 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Searson, D.P., Leahy, D.E., Willis, M.J.: GPTIPS: an open source genetic programming toolbox for multigene symbolic regression. In: International Multiconference of Engineers And Computer Scientists, pp. 77–80 (2010)

  40. Hiden, H.G.: Data-based modelling using genetic programming. PhD Thesis, Dept. Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Newcastle, UK (1998)

  41. Hinchliffe, M., Hiden, H., Mckay, B., Willis, M., Tham, M., Barton, G.: Modelling chemical process systems using a multi-gene genetic programming algorithm. Late breaking paper, GP’96. 624, pp 28-31. Stanford (1996)

  42. Çayda°, U., Ekici, S.: Support vector machines models for surface roughness prediction in CNC turning of AISI 304 Austenitic stainless steel. J. Intell. Manuf. 23, 639–650 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta, A.K.: Predictive modelling of turning operations using response surface methodology, artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48, 763–778 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Garg, A., Tai, K., Lee, C.H., Savalani, M.M.: A Hybrid M5′-genetic programming approach for ensuring greater trustworthiness of prediction ability in modelling of FDM process. J. Intell. Manuf. (2013). doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0734-1

  45. Kecman, V.: Learning And Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, And Fuzzy Logic Models. MIT, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pelckmans, K., Suykens, J.AK., Vangestel, T., De Brabanter, J., Lukas, L., Hamers, B., et al.: LS-SVMlab: A MATLAB/C Toolbox for Least Squares Support Vector Machines. Tutorial. Kuleuven-Esat, Leuven (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Salgado, D.R., Alonso, F.J.: An approach based on current and sound signals for in-process tool wear monitoring. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47, 2140–2152 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Salgado, D.R., Alonso, F.J., Cambero, I., Marcelo, A.: In-process surface roughness prediction system using cutting vibrations in turning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 43, 40–51 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ramanan, T.R., Sridharan, R., Shashikant, K.S., Haq, A.N.: An artificial neural network based heuristic for flow shop scheduling problems. J. Intell. Manuf. 22, 279–288 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tian, Z.: An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. J. Intell. Manuf. 23, 227–237 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akhil Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garg, A., Garg, A. & Tai, K. A multi-gene genetic programming model for estimating stress-dependent soil water retention curves. Comput Geosci 18, 45–56 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9381-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9381-z

Keywords

Navigation