Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predicting the effects of nanoparticles on compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers by gene expression programming

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neural Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 15 April 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the present work, the effect of SiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles on compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers with different mixtures of rice husk ash, fly ash, nanoalumina and nanosilica has been predicted by gene expression programming. The models were constructed by 12 input parameters, namely the water curing time, the rice husk ash content, the fly ash content, the water glass content, NaOH content, the water content, the aggregate content, SiO2 nanoparticle content, Al2O3 nanoparticle content, oven curing temperature, oven curing time and test trial number. The value for the output layer was the compressive strength. According to the input parameters in gene expression programming models, the data were trained and tested, and the effects of SiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles on compressive strength of the specimens were predicted with a tiny error. The results indicate that gene expression programming model is a powerful tool for predicting the effect of nanoparticles on compressive strength of the geopolymers in the considered range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 15 April 2020

    The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article because it significantly overlaps with a number of articles including those that were under consideration at the same time and previously published articles. Additionally, the article shows evidence of peer review manipulation. The authors have not responded to any correspondence regarding this retraction.

References

  1. Poulesquen A, Frizon F, Lambertin D (2011) Rheological behavior of alkali-activated metakaolin during geopolymerization. J Non-Cryst Solids 357:3565–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pacheco-Torgal F, Castro-Gomes JP, Jalali S (2008) Investigations on mix design of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Constr Build Mater 22:1939–1949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nazari A, Riahi S (2010) Microstructural, thermal, physical and mechanical behavior of the self compacting concrete containing SiO2 nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A 527:7663–7672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nazari A, Riahi S (2011) Improvement compressive strength of concrete in different curing media by Al2O3 nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A 528:1183–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riahi S, Nazari A (2012) The effects of nanoparticles on early age compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers. Ceram Int 38:4467–4476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nazari A, Riahi S (2012) Prediction of the effects of nanoparticles on early-age compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers by fuzzy logic. Int J Damage Mech. doi:10.1177/1056789512442519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cevik A, Sonebi M (2009) Genetic programming based formulation for fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete containing pulverised fuel ash. Constr Build Mater 23(7):2614–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milani AA, Nazari A (2012) Modeling ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of functionally graded steels by gene expression programming. Int J Damage Mech 21(4):465–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nazari A, Khalaj G, Didehvar N (2012) Computational investigations of the impact resistance of aluminum-epoxy laminated composites. Int J Damage Mech 21(5):623–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cevik A, Guzelbey İH (2007) A soft computing based approach for the prediction of ultimate strength of metal plates in compression. Eng Struct 29(3):383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cevik A, Sonebi M (2008) Modelling the performance of self-compacting SIFCON of cement slurries using genetic programming technique. Comput Concr 5:475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cevik A (2007) A new formulation for longitudinally stiffened webs subjected to patch loading. J Constr Steel Res 63:1328–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nazari A (2012) Experimental study and computer-aided prediction of percentage of water absorption of geopolymers produced by waste fly ash and rice husk bark ash. Int J Miner Process 110–111:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chanh NV, Trung BD, Tuan DV (2008) Recent research geopolymer concrete. In: The 3rd ACF international conference—ACF/VCA

  15. Sathia R, Babu KG, Santhana M (2008) Durability study of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. In: The 3rd ACF international conference—ACF/VCA

  16. Alvarez-Ayuso E, Querol X, Plana F, Alastuey A, Moreno N, Izquierdo M, Font O, Moreno T, Diez S, Vazquez E, Barra M (2008) Environmental, physical and structural characterization of geopolymer matrixes synthesized from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. J Hazard Mater 154:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenblatt F (1962) Principles of neuro dynamics: perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Spartan Books, Washington, DC

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, William RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (eds) Proceeding parallel distributed processing foundation, vol 1. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu SW, Huang JH, Sung JC, Lee CC (2002) Detection of cracks using neural networks and computational mechanics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 191(25–26):2831–2845

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson JA (1983) Cognitive and psychological computation with neural models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern V.SMC-13 5:799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Nat Acad Sci 79:2554–2558

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Cevik A, Sonebi M (2009) Genetic programming based formulation for fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete containing pulverised fuel ash. Constr Build Mater 23(7):2614–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Topcu IB, Sarıdemir M (2008) Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Comp Mater Sci 41(3):305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shadi Riahi.

Additional information

The Editor-in-Chief has retracted this article because it significantly overlaps with a number of articles including those that were under consideration at the same time and previously published articles. Additionally, the article shows evidence of peer review manipulation. The authors have not responded to any correspondence regarding this retraction.

About this article

Cite this article

Nazari, A., Riahi, S. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predicting the effects of nanoparticles on compressive strength of ash-based geopolymers by gene expression programming. Neural Comput & Applic 23, 1677–1685 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1127-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1127-7

Keywords

Navigation