Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimized injection-molding process for thin-walled polypropylene part using genetic programming and interior point solver

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the injection molding technique is selected, and different internal and external defects have been evaluated, including warpage, short shot, and shrinkage. Different geometric and injection machine inputs such as gate type, filling time, part cooling time, holding pressure time, and melt temperature have been chosen, respectively. The Taguchi method is applied to find the best level of each parameter. In recent years, researchers have been focused on using machine learning techniques with a combination of meta-heuristic methods to calculate the optimal process parameters in injection molding to increase the quality of the final product. However, the computational load of the machine learning methods and meta-heuristic algorithms is far behind in handling real-time applications. The main motivation of this study is to reach an accurate model with a low computational load to handle the real-time computational load even in the presence of lower CPU power controller mechanisms. Then, the genetic programming method is employed to extract the optimal mathematical model of the injection-molding process, which relates the processing parameters, including part cooling time, filling time, melt temperature, and holding pressure time, to output which is the combination of shrinkage rate, short shot, and warpage. The extracted optimal mathematical formulation of the genetic programming method is employed inside the interior point nonlinear programming solver via the fmincon function of MATLAB software to calculate the optimal parameters of the process as fast as possible. The genetic programming results are compared with previous methods such as decision tree, support vector regression, and multilayer perceptron to prove the acceptable accuracy of the first part of the paper with the lower computational load. Then, the means square error between the finite element method and the extracted result using the hybrid genetic programming and interior point nonlinear programming solver is 47.06%, 93.75%, and 83.63% lower than previous methods, including decision tree, support vector regression, and multilayer perceptron, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in this work have been properly cited within the article.

Code availability

The authors declare that there is no code to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Shi H, Xie S, Wang X (2013) A warpage optimization method for injection molding using artificial neural network with parametric sampling evaluation strategy. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(1):343–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassan H et al (2010) Modeling the effect of cooling system on the shrinkage and temperature of the polymer by injection molding. Appl Therm Eng 30(13):1547–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moayyedian M, Abhary K, Marian R (2017) The analysis of short shot possibility in injection molding process. The Int J Advanced Manuf Technol 91(9):3977–3989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moayyedian M, Abhary K, Marian R (2016) Gate design and filling process analysis of the cavity in injection molding process. Advances in Manufacturing 4(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moayyedian M, Abhary K, Marian R (2018) Optimization of injection molding process based on fuzzy quality evaluation and Taguchi experimental design. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 21:150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pandelidis IO, Kao J-F (1990) DETECTOR: A knowledge-based system for injection molding diagnostics. J Intell Manuf 1(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee B, Kim B (1995) Optimization of part wall thicknesses to reduce warpage of injection-molded parts based on the modified complex method. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 34(5):793–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He W et al (1998) Automated process parameter resetting for injection moulding: a fuzzy-neuro approach. J Intell Manuf 9(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qazani, MRC, et al (2022) Estimation of tool–chip contact length using optimized machine learning in orthogonal cutting. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence Accepted recently.

  10. Lotti C, Ueki M, Bretas R (2002) Prediction of the shrinkage of injection molded iPP plaques using artificial neural networks. J Injection Molding Technol 6(3):157

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mok S, Kwong CK (2002) Application of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic in a case-based system for initial process parameter setting of injection molding. J Intell Manuf 13(3):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurtaran H, Erzurumlu T (2006) Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastic parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. The Int J Advanced Manufacturing Technol 27(5):468–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao Y, Turng LS, Wang X (2008) Adaptive geometry and process optimization for injection molding using the Kriging surrogate model trained by numerical simulation. Advances in Polymer Technology: J Polymer Processing Institute 27(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan H et al (2009) Effect of cooling system on the polymer temperature and solidification during injection molding. Appl Therm Eng 29(8–9):1786–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang LQ, Chassapis C, Manoochehri S (1997) Optimal cooling system design for multi-cavity injection molding. Finite Elem Anal Des 26(3):229–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin F et al (2011) Back propagation neural network modeling for warpage prediction and optimization of plastic products during injection molding. Mater Des 32(4):1844–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai K-M, Luo H-J (2017) An inverse model for injection molding of optical lens using artificial neural network coupled with genetic algorithm. J Intell Manuf 28(2):473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbasalizadeh M et al (2018) Experimental study to optimize shrinkage behavior of semi-crystalline and amorphous thermoplastics. Iran J Mater Sci Eng 15(4):41–51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khosravani MR, Nasiri S (2020) Injection molding manufacturing process: Review of case-based reasoning applications. J Intell Manuf 31(4):847–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdul R et al (2020) Shrinkage prediction of injection molded high density polyethylene parts with taguchi/artificial neural network hybrid experimental design. Int J Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 14(2):345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song Z et al (2020) Optimization and prediction of volume shrinkage and warpage of injection-molded thin-walled parts based on neural network. The Int J of Adv Manufacturing Technol 109(3):755–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Torres-Alba A et al (2021) A hybrid cooling model based on the use of newly designed fluted conformal cooling channels and fastcool inserts for green molds. Polymers 13(18):3115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Torres-Alba A et al (2021) Application of new triple hook-shaped conformal cooling channels for cores and sliders in injection molding to reduce residual stress and warping in complex plastic optical parts. Polymers 13(17):2944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mercado-Colmenero JM et al (2021) A new conformal cooling system for plastic collimators based on the use of complex geometries and optimization of temperature profiles. Polymers 13(16):2744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao, Z, et al.(2021) Machine learning aided design of conformal cooling channels for injection molding. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 1–19.

  26. Li, Y, JC. (2021) Chen, and W.M. Ali, Process optimization and in-mold sensing enabled dimensional prediction for high precision injection molding. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 1–17.

  27. Speranza V et al (2021) Prediction of morphology development within micro–injection molding samples. Polymer 228:123850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung H et al (2021) Application of machine learning techniques in injection molding quality prediction: implications on sustainable manufacturing industry. Sustainability 13(8):4120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Uğuroğlu, E. (2021) Near-real time quality prediction in a plastic injection molding process using Apache spark. in 2021 International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Controls (ISCSIC). 2021. IEEE.

  30. Párizs, RD, et al.(2022) Machine learning in injection molding: an industry 4.0 method of quality prediction. Sensors, 22(7): p. 2704.

  31. Ke K-C, Huang M-S (2022) Enhancement of multilayer perceptron model training accuracy through the optimization of hyperparameters: a case study of the quality prediction of injection-molded parts. The Int J Adv Manufacturing Technol 118(7):2247–2263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Koza JR, Poli R (2005) Genetic programming. Search methodologies. Springer, pp 127–164

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Koza, J.R., Genetic programming II. Vol. 17. 1994: MIT press Cambridge.

  34. Moayyedian M, Derakhshandeh JF, Said S (2019) Experimental investigations of significant parameters of strain measurement employing Taguchi method. SN Applied Sciences 1(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mojaver M et al (2022) Comparative study on air gasification of plastic waste and conventional biomass based on coupling of AHP/TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis. Chemosphere 286:131867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Azdast T et al (2019) Investigation of mechanical and morphological properties of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene nanocomposite foams from analytical hierarchy process point of view. Polym Bull 76(5):2579–2599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Daryadel M et al (2018) Simultaneous decision analysis on the structural and mechanical properties of polymeric microcellular nanocomposites foamed using CO2. J Appl Polym Sci 135(14):46098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Molani S et al (2018) A Taguchi analysis on structural properties of polypropylene microcellular nanocomposite foams containing Fe2O3 nanoparticles in batch process. Plast, Rubber Compos 47(3):106–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mosavvar A et al (2019) Tensile properties of friction stir welding of thermoplastic pipes based on a novel designed mechanism. Welding in the World 63(3):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nocedal, J. and S.J. Wright, Interior-point methods for nonlinear programming. Numerical Optimization, 2006: p. 563–597.

  41. Silva, S. A Genetic Programming Toolbox for MATLAB. 2018 [cited 2022 29/04/2022]; Available from: http://gplab.sourceforge.net/index.html.

  42. Pedrammehr S et al (2022) Machine learning-based modelling and meta-heuristic-based optimization of specific tool wear and surface roughness in the milling process. Axioms 11(9):430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Qazani MRC, Parvaz H, Pedrammehr S (2022) Optimization of fixture locating layout design using comprehensive optimized machine learning. The Int J Adv Manufact Technol 122(5):2701–2717

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar, K, et al. (2021) SpinalXNet: Transfer learning with modified fully connected layer for X-ray image classification. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE). IEEE.

  45. Khanam, S., et al.(2022) CoV-TI-Net: transferred initialization with modified end layer for COVID-19 diagnosis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.09556

  46. Qazani MRC et al (2021) Prediction of motion simulator signals using time-series neural networks. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 57(5):3383–3392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Qazani, MRC, et al. (2021) Time series prediction of driving motion scenarios using fuzzy neural networks:* Motion Signal Prediction Using FNNs. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM). IEEE.

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that there is no funding to report regarding the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait, Kuwait

    Mehdi Moayyedian

  2. Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3216, Australia

    Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani

  3. Department of Manufacturing and Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Vahid Pourmostaghimi

Authors
  1. Mehdi Moayyedian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vahid Pourmostaghimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mehdi Moayyedian: investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, supervision; Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, writing—original draft, writing-review and editing, visualization; Vahid Pourmostaghimi: writing—review and editing, conceptualization, methodology, software.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Chalak Qazani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The authors declare that all authors have read and approved to submit this manuscript to IJAMT.

Consent for publication

The authors declare that all authors agree to sign the transfer of copyright for the publisher to publish this article upon acceptance.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moayyedian, M., Qazani, M.R.C. & Pourmostaghimi, V. Optimized injection-molding process for thin-walled polypropylene part using genetic programming and interior point solver. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124, 297–313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10551-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10551-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation