Skip to main content

An Investigation into the Use of Different Search Strategies with Grammatical Evolution

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2278))

Abstract

We present an investigation into the performance of Grammatical Evolution using a number of different search strategies, Simulated Annealing, Hill Climbing, Random Search and Genetic Algorithms. Comparative results on three different problems are examined. We analyse the nature of the search spaces presented by these problems and offer an explanation for the contrasting performance of each of the search strategies. Our results show that Genetic Algorithms provide a consistent level of performance across all three problems successfully coping with sensitivity of the system to discrete changes in the selection of productions from the associated grammar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldberg, David E. 1989. Genetic Algorthms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkpatrick, S., Gerlatt, C.D.Jr., and Vecchi, M.P., Optimization by Simulated Annealing, Science 220, 671–680, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell, M.and Holland, J.H. 1993. When will a Genetic Algorthm Outperform Hill Climbing? Technical report, Santa Fe Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koza, J. 1992. Genetic Programming. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keijzer M., O’Neill M., Ryan C., Cattolico M., Babovic V. Ripple Crossover In Genetic Programming. Euro GP 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Neill M., Ryan C. Grammatical Evolution. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, To appear 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langdon W.B., Poli R. Why Ants are Hard. Technical Report CSRP-98-4, University of Birmingham, School of Computer Science, January 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Sullivan, J., Ryan, C. (2002). An Investigation into the Use of Different Search Strategies with Grammatical Evolution. In: Foster, J.A., Lutton, E., Miller, J., Ryan, C., Tettamanzi, A. (eds) Genetic Programming. EuroGP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45984-7_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45984-7_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43378-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45984-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics