Abstract
Groundwater (GW) level prediction is important for effective GW resource management. It is hypothesized that using precipitation data in GW level modelling will increase the overall accuracy of the results and that the distance of the observation well to the weather station (where precipitation data are obtained) will affect the model outcome. Here, genetic programming (GP) was used to predict GW level fluctuation in multiple observation wells under three scenarios to test these hypotheses. In Scenario 1, GW level and precipitation data were used as input data. Scenarios 2 only had GW level data as inputs to the model, and in Scenarios 3, only precipitation data were used as inputs. Long-term GW level time series data covering a period of 8 years were used to train and test the GP model. Further, to examine the effect of data from previous time periods on the accuracy of GW level prediction, 12 models with input data up to 12 months prior to the current period were investigated. Model performance was evaluated using two criteria, coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Results show that when predicting GW levels through GP, using GW level and precipitation data together (Scenario 1) produces results with higher accuracy compared to only using GW level (Scenario 2) or precipitation data (Scenario 3). Additionally, it was found that model accuracy was highest for the well located closest to the weather station (where precipitation data were collected), demonstrating the importance of weather station location in GW level prediction. It was also found that using data from up to six previous time periods (months) can be the most efficient combination of input data for accurate predictions. The findings from this study are useful for increasing the prediction accuracy of GW level variations in unconfined aquifers for sustainable GW resource management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data used in the study are available from the authors upon request.
References
Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1–4):28–40
Amaranto A, Munoz-Arriola F, Corzo G, Solomatine DP, Meyer G (1753) Semi-seasonal groundwater forecast using multiple data-driven models in an irrigated cropland. J Hydroinf 20(6), 1227–1246.
Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Kazemian N (2015) Assessment of heavy metals concentrations with emphasis on arsenic in the Tabriz plain aquifers, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 74(1):297–313
Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Najib M, Kazemian N, Adamowski J (2016a) Characterization of hydrogeologic properties of the Tabriz plain multilayer aquifer system, NW Iran. Arab J Geosci 9(2):147
Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Baghban H (2016b) A supervised committee machine artificial intelligent for improving DRASTIC method to assess groundwater contamination risk: a case study from Tabriz plain aquifer, Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(3):883–899
Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Tziritis E (2017) Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater resources in Tabriz plain, northwest of Iran. Appl Water Sci 7(7):3997–4011
Bordbar A, Taassob A, Khojasteh D, Marengo M, Kamali R (2018) Maximum spreading and rebound of a droplet impacting onto a spherical surface at low Weber numbers. Langmuir 34(17):5149–5158
Bricker SH, Banks VJ, Galik G, Tapete D, Jones R (2017) Accounting for groundwater in future city visions. Land Use Policy 69:618–630
Cobaner M, Babayigit B, Dogan A (2016) Estimation of groundwater levels with surface observations via genetic programming. J Am Water Works Assoc 108(6):E335–E348
Dalin C, Wada Y, Kastner T, Puma MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543(7647):700
Djurovic N, Domazet M, Stricevic R, Pocuca V, Spalevic V, Pivic R, Gregoric E, Domazet U (2015) Comparison of groundwater level models based on artificial neural networks and ANFIS. Sci World J 2015:742138
Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Mariño MA (2013) Prediction and simulation of monthly groundwater levels by genetic programming. J Hydro Environ Res 7(4):253–260
Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Marino MA (2014) Genetic programming in groundwater modeling. J Hydrol Eng 19(12):04014031
Famiglietti JS (2014) The global groundwater crisis. Nat Climate Change 4(11):945
Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11
Gorgij AD, Kisi O, Moghaddam AA (2017) Groundwater budget forecasting, using hybrid wavelet-ANN-GP modelling: a case study of Azarshahr Plain, East Azerbaijan Iran. Hydrol Res 48(2):455–467
Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377(1–2):80–91
Karami F (2011) Evaluation of Meteorological Drought Effects in the Reduction of Ground Water table (Case study: Tabriz Plain). J Geogr Plan 37:111–131 (In Persian)
Kasiviswanathan KS, Saravanan S, Balamurugan M, Saravanan K (2016) Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(1):27
Khojasteh D, Bordbar A, Kamali R, Marengo M (2017) Curvature effect on droplet impacting onto hydrophobic and superhydrophobic spheres. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 31(6–8):310–323
Krishna B, Satyaji Rao YR, Vijaya T (2008) Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process Int J 22(8):1180–1188
Mehr AD, Nourani V, Kahya E, Hrnjica B, Sattar AM, Yaseen ZM (2018) Genetic programming in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review. J Hydrol 566:643–667
Shanker M, Hu MY, Hung MS (1996) Effect of data standardization on neural network training. Omega 24(4):385–397
Shiri J, Kişi Ö (2011) Comparison of genetic programming with neuro-fuzzy systems for predicting short-term water table depth fluctuations. Comput Geosci 37(10):1692–1701
Shiri J, Kisi O, Yoon H, Lee KK, Nazemi AH (2013) Predicting groundwater level fluctuations with meteorological effect implications—A comparative study among soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci 56:32–44
Shrestha DL, Solomatine DP (2006) Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output. Neural Netw 19(2):225–235
Sivapragasam C, Kannabiran K, Karthik G, Raja S (2015) Assessing suitability of GP modeling for groundwater level. Aquatic Proc 4:693–699
Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1670–1676
Wada Y (2016) Modeling groundwater depletion at regional and global scales: present state and future prospects. Surv Geophys 37(2):419–451
Wheater HS, Mathias SA, Li X (eds) (2010) Groundwater modelling in arid and semi-arid areas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Yadav B, Ch S, Mathur S, Adamowski J (2017) Assessing the suitability of extreme learning machines (ELM) for groundwater level prediction. J Water Land Dev 32(1):103–112
Yu H, Wen X, Feng Q, Deo RC, Si J, Wu M (2018) Comparative study of hybrid-wavelet artificial intelligence models for monthly groundwater depth forecasting in extreme arid regions, Northwest China. Water Resour Manag 32(1):301–323
Zarghami M, Akbariyeh S (2012) System dynamics modeling for complex urban water systems: application to the city of Tabriz Iran. Resour Conserv Recycling 60:99–106
Ziolkowska JR, Reyes R (2017) Groundwater level changes due to extreme weather—an evaluation tool for sustainable water management. Water 9:117. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020117
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the University of New South Wales (UNSW, Sydney) and the University of Tehran (UT) for providing funding and resources for this work. We would like to thank Prof. Bozorg-Haddad for his valuable suggestions and constructive comments in the initial stages of this research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadat-Noori, M., Glamore, W. & Khojasteh, D. Groundwater level prediction using genetic programming: the importance of precipitation data and weather station location on model accuracy. Environ Earth Sci 79, 37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8776-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8776-0