Skip to main content
Log in

Groundwater level prediction using genetic programming: the importance of precipitation data and weather station location on model accuracy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater (GW) level prediction is important for effective GW resource management. It is hypothesized that using precipitation data in GW level modelling will increase the overall accuracy of the results and that the distance of the observation well to the weather station (where precipitation data are obtained) will affect the model outcome. Here, genetic programming (GP) was used to predict GW level fluctuation in multiple observation wells under three scenarios to test these hypotheses. In Scenario 1, GW level and precipitation data were used as input data. Scenarios 2 only had GW level data as inputs to the model, and in Scenarios 3, only precipitation data were used as inputs. Long-term GW level time series data covering a period of 8 years were used to train and test the GP model. Further, to examine the effect of data from previous time periods on the accuracy of GW level prediction, 12 models with input data up to 12 months prior to the current period were investigated. Model performance was evaluated using two criteria, coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Results show that when predicting GW levels through GP, using GW level and precipitation data together (Scenario 1) produces results with higher accuracy compared to only using GW level (Scenario 2) or precipitation data (Scenario 3). Additionally, it was found that model accuracy was highest for the well located closest to the weather station (where precipitation data were collected), demonstrating the importance of weather station location in GW level prediction. It was also found that using data from up to six previous time periods (months) can be the most efficient combination of input data for accurate predictions. The findings from this study are useful for increasing the prediction accuracy of GW level variations in unconfined aquifers for sustainable GW resource management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in the study are available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Adamowski J, Chan HF (2011) A wavelet neural network conjunction model for groundwater level forecasting. J Hydrol 407(1–4):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaranto A, Munoz-Arriola F, Corzo G, Solomatine DP, Meyer G (1753) Semi-seasonal groundwater forecast using multiple data-driven models in an irrigated cropland. J Hydroinf 20(6), 1227–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Kazemian N (2015) Assessment of heavy metals concentrations with emphasis on arsenic in the Tabriz plain aquifers, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 74(1):297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Najib M, Kazemian N, Adamowski J (2016a) Characterization of hydrogeologic properties of the Tabriz plain multilayer aquifer system, NW Iran. Arab J Geosci 9(2):147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Baghban H (2016b) A supervised committee machine artificial intelligent for improving DRASTIC method to assess groundwater contamination risk: a case study from Tabriz plain aquifer, Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(3):883–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzegar R, Moghaddam AA, Tziritis E (2017) Hydrogeochemical features of groundwater resources in Tabriz plain, northwest of Iran. Appl Water Sci 7(7):3997–4011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordbar A, Taassob A, Khojasteh D, Marengo M, Kamali R (2018) Maximum spreading and rebound of a droplet impacting onto a spherical surface at low Weber numbers. Langmuir 34(17):5149–5158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bricker SH, Banks VJ, Galik G, Tapete D, Jones R (2017) Accounting for groundwater in future city visions. Land Use Policy 69:618–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobaner M, Babayigit B, Dogan A (2016) Estimation of groundwater levels with surface observations via genetic programming. J Am Water Works Assoc 108(6):E335–E348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalin C, Wada Y, Kastner T, Puma MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543(7647):700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djurovic N, Domazet M, Stricevic R, Pocuca V, Spalevic V, Pivic R, Gregoric E, Domazet U (2015) Comparison of groundwater level models based on artificial neural networks and ANFIS. Sci World J 2015:742138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Mariño MA (2013) Prediction and simulation of monthly groundwater levels by genetic programming. J Hydro Environ Res 7(4):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Marino MA (2014) Genetic programming in groundwater modeling. J Hydrol Eng 19(12):04014031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Famiglietti JS (2014) The global groundwater crisis. Nat Climate Change 4(11):945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz JN, Brenning A, Petschko H, Leopold P (2015) Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Comput Geosci 81:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorgij AD, Kisi O, Moghaddam AA (2017) Groundwater budget forecasting, using hybrid wavelet-ANN-GP modelling: a case study of Azarshahr Plain, East Azerbaijan Iran. Hydrol Res 48(2):455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377(1–2):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami F (2011) Evaluation of Meteorological Drought Effects in the Reduction of Ground Water table (Case study: Tabriz Plain). J Geogr Plan 37:111–131 (In Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasiviswanathan KS, Saravanan S, Balamurugan M, Saravanan K (2016) Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khojasteh D, Bordbar A, Kamali R, Marengo M (2017) Curvature effect on droplet impacting onto hydrophobic and superhydrophobic spheres. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 31(6–8):310–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna B, Satyaji Rao YR, Vijaya T (2008) Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process Int J 22(8):1180–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehr AD, Nourani V, Kahya E, Hrnjica B, Sattar AM, Yaseen ZM (2018) Genetic programming in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review. J Hydrol 566:643–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanker M, Hu MY, Hung MS (1996) Effect of data standardization on neural network training. Omega 24(4):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Kişi Ö (2011) Comparison of genetic programming with neuro-fuzzy systems for predicting short-term water table depth fluctuations. Comput Geosci 37(10):1692–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiri J, Kisi O, Yoon H, Lee KK, Nazemi AH (2013) Predicting groundwater level fluctuations with meteorological effect implications—A comparative study among soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci 56:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha DL, Solomatine DP (2006) Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output. Neural Netw 19(2):225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapragasam C, Kannabiran K, Karthik G, Raja S (2015) Assessing suitability of GP modeling for groundwater level. Aquatic Proc 4:693–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y (2016) Modeling groundwater depletion at regional and global scales: present state and future prospects. Surv Geophys 37(2):419–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheater HS, Mathias SA, Li X (eds) (2010) Groundwater modelling in arid and semi-arid areas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav B, Ch S, Mathur S, Adamowski J (2017) Assessing the suitability of extreme learning machines (ELM) for groundwater level prediction. J Water Land Dev 32(1):103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Wen X, Feng Q, Deo RC, Si J, Wu M (2018) Comparative study of hybrid-wavelet artificial intelligence models for monthly groundwater depth forecasting in extreme arid regions, Northwest China. Water Resour Manag 32(1):301–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami M, Akbariyeh S (2012) System dynamics modeling for complex urban water systems: application to the city of Tabriz Iran. Resour Conserv Recycling 60:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziolkowska JR, Reyes R (2017) Groundwater level changes due to extreme weather—an evaluation tool for sustainable water management. Water 9:117. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9020117

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of New South Wales (UNSW, Sydney) and the University of Tehran (UT) for providing funding and resources for this work. We would like to thank Prof. Bozorg-Haddad for his valuable suggestions and constructive comments in the initial stages of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmood Sadat-Noori.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadat-Noori, M., Glamore, W. & Khojasteh, D. Groundwater level prediction using genetic programming: the importance of precipitation data and weather station location on model accuracy. Environ Earth Sci 79, 37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8776-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8776-0

Keywords

Navigation