Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.7970
the dimensionality of phenotypic variation, and
the causal screening off of phenotypic variables by other phenotypic variables.
With this framework, the evolutionary advantages that have been attributed to modularity do not derive from modularity per se. Rather, they require that there be an 'alignment' between the spaces of phenotypic variation, and the selection gradients that are available to the organism. Modularity may facilitate such alignment, but it is not sufficient; the appropriate phenotype-fitness map in conjunction with the genotype-phenotype map is also necessary for evolvability.
Conclusion
I have endeavoured in this essay to delve into some of the low-level conceptual issues associated with the idea of modularity in the genotype-phenotype map. My main proposal is that the evolutionary advantages that have been attributed to modularity do not derive from modularity per se. Rather, they require that there be an 'alignment' between the spaces of phenotypic variation, and the selection gradients that are available to the organism. Modularity in the genotype-phenotype map may make such an alignment more readily attained, but it is not sufficient; the appropriate phenotype-fitness map in conjunction with the genotype-phenotype map is also necessary for evolvability.",
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=10484&mode=toc",
Genetic Programming entries for Lee Altenberg