- author = "Thomas Helmuth and Lee Spector",
- title = "Explaining and Exploiting the Advantages of Down-sampled Lexicase Selection",
- booktitle = "2020 Conference on Artificial Life",
- year = "2020",
- editor = "Josh Bongard and Juniper Lovato and Laurent Hebert-Dufresne and Radhakrishna Dasari and Lisa Soros",
- pages = "341--349",
- address = "online",
- month = "13-18 " # jul,
- organisation = "ISAL",
- publisher = "Massachusetts Institute of Technology",
- keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming",
-
DOI = "
doi:10.1162/isal_a_00334",
- size = "9 pages",
- abstract = "In genetic programming, parent selection is ordinarily based on aggregate measures of performance across an entire training set. Lexicase selection, by contrast, selects on the basis of performance on random sequences of test cases; this has been shown to enhance problem-solving power in many circumstances. Lexicase selection can also be seen as better reflecting biological evolution, by modeling sequences of challenges that organisms face over their lifetimes. Recent work has demonstrated that the advantages of lexicase selection can be amplified by down-sampling, meaning that only a random subsample of the training cases is used each generation, which can also be seen as modeling environmental change over time. Here we provide the most extensive bench-marking of down-sampled lexicase selection to date, showing that its benefits hold up to increased scrutiny. The reasons that down-sampling helps, however, are not yet fully understood. Hypotheses include that down-sampling allows for more generations to be processed with the same budget of program evaluations; that the variation of training data across generations acts as a changing environment, encouraging adaptation; or that it reduces overfitting, leading to more general solutions. We systematically evaluate these hypotheses, finding evidence against all three, and instead draw the conclusion that down-sampled lexicase selections main benefit stems from the fact that it allows GP to examine more individuals within the same computational budget, even though each individual is examined less completely.",
-
notes = "Montreal, Canada,
isal_a_00357.pdf",
