Comparing methods for module identification in grammatical evolution

Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8129

@InProceedings{Swafford:2012:GECCO,

• author = "John Swafford and Miguel Nicolau and Erik Hemberg and Michael O'Neill and Anthony Brabazon",
• title = "Comparing methods for module identification in grammatical evolution",
• booktitle = "GECCO '12: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference",
• year = "2012",
• editor = "Terry Soule and Anne Auger and Jason Moore and David Pelta and Christine Solnon and Mike Preuss and Alan Dorin and Yew-Soon Ong and Christian Blum and Dario Landa Silva and Frank Neumann and Tina Yu and Aniko Ekart and Will Browne and Tim Kovacs and Man-Leung Wong and Clara Pizzuti and Jon Rowe and Tobias Friedrich and Giovanni Squillero and Nicolas Bredeche and Stephen L. Smith and Alison Motsinger-Reif and Jose Lozano and Martin Pelikan and Silja Meyer-Nienberg and Christian Igel and Greg Hornby and Rene Doursat and Steve Gustafson and Gustavo Olague and Shin Yoo and John Clark and Gabriela Ochoa and Gisele Pappa and Fernando Lobo and Daniel Tauritz and Jurgen Branke and Kalyanmoy Deb",
• isbn13 = "978-1-4503-1177-9",
• pages = "823--830",
• keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming",
• month = "7-11 " # jul,
• organisation = "SIGEVO",
• address = "Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA",
• DOI = "doi:10.1145/2330163.2330277",
• publisher = "ACM",
• publisher_address = "New York, NY, USA",
• abstract = "Modularity has been an important vein of research in evolutionary algorithms. Past research in evolutionary computation has shown that techniques able to decompose the benchmark problems examined in this work into smaller, more easily solved, sub-problems have an advantage over those which do not. This work describes and analyzes a number of approaches to discover sub-solutions (modules) in the grammatical evolution algorithm. Data from the experiments carried out show that particular approaches to identifying modules are better suited to certain problem types, at varying levels of difficulty. The results presented here show that some of these approaches are able to significantly outperform standard grammatical evolution and grammatical evolution using automatically defined functions on a subset of the problems tested. The results also point to a number of possibilities for extending this work to further enhance approaches to modularity.",
• notes = "Also known as \cite{2330277} GECCO-2012 A joint meeting of the twenty first international conference on genetic algorithms (ICGA-2012) and the seventeenth annual genetic programming conference (GP-2012)",

}

Genetic Programming entries for John Mark Swafford Miguel Nicolau Erik Hemberg Michael O'Neill Anthony Brabazon

Citations