Cartesian genetic programming encoded artificial neural networks: a comparison using three benchmarks

Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.7630

@InProceedings{Turner:2013:GECCO,

• author = "Andrew James Turner and Julian Francis Miller",
• title = "Cartesian genetic programming encoded artificial neural networks: a comparison using three benchmarks",
• booktitle = "GECCO '13: Proceeding of the fifteenth annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference",
• year = "2013",
• editor = "Christian Blum and Enrique Alba and Anne Auger and Jaume Bacardit and Josh Bongard and Juergen Branke and Nicolas Bredeche and Dimo Brockhoff and Francisco Chicano and Alan Dorin and Rene Doursat and Aniko Ekart and Tobias Friedrich and Mario Giacobini and Mark Harman and Hitoshi Iba and Christian Igel and Thomas Jansen and Tim Kovacs and Taras Kowaliw and Manuel Lopez-Ibanez and Jose A. Lozano and Gabriel Luque and John McCall and Alberto Moraglio and Alison Motsinger-Reif and Frank Neumann and Gabriela Ochoa and Gustavo Olague and Yew-Soon Ong and Michael E. Palmer and Gisele Lobo Pappa and Konstantinos E. Parsopoulos and Thomas Schmickl and Stephen L. Smith and Christine Solnon and Thomas Stuetzle and El-Ghazali Talbi and Daniel Tauritz and Leonardo Vanneschi",
• isbn13 = "978-1-4503-1963-8",
• pages = "1005--1012",
• keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, cartesian genetic programming",
• month = "6-10 " # jul,
• organisation = "SIGEVO",
• address = "Amsterdam, The Netherlands",
• DOI = "doi:10.1145/2463372.2463484",
• publisher = "ACM",
• publisher_address = "New York, NY, USA",
• abstract = "Neuroevolution, the application of evolutionary algorithms to artificial neural networks (ANNs), is well-established in machine learning. Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) is a graph-based form of Genetic Programming which can easily represent ANNs. Cartesian Genetic Programming encoded ANNs (CGPANNs) can evolve every aspect of an ANN: weights, topology, arity and node transfer functions. This makes CGPANNs very suited to situations where appropriate configurations are not known in advance. The effectiveness of CGPANNs is compared with a large number of previous methods on three benchmark problems. The results show that CGPANNs perform as well as or better than many other approaches. We also discuss the strength and weaknesses of each of the three benchmarks.",
• notes = "Also known as \cite{2463484} GECCO-2013 A joint meeting of the twenty second international conference on genetic algorithms (ICGA-2013) and the eighteenth annual genetic programming conference (GP-2013)",

}

Genetic Programming entries for Andrew James Turner Julian F Miller

Citations