Extending Cartesian Genetic Programming via Iterative Subgraph Assessment
Created by W.Langdon from
gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.9039
- @InProceedings{DBLP:conf/ijcci/CuiTCLWH25,
-
author = "Henning Cui and Camilo {De La Torre} and
Sylvain Cussat-Blanc and Herve Luga and Dennis G. Wilson and
Joerg Haehner",
-
title = "Extending Cartesian Genetic Programming via Iterative
Subgraph Assessment",
-
booktitle = "Computational Intelligence - 17th International Joint
Conference, {IJCCI} 2025, Marbella, Spain, October
22-24, 2025, Proceedings, Part {II}",
-
year = "2025",
-
editor = "Francesco Marcelloni and Kurosh Madani and
Niki {van Stein} and Joaquim Filipe",
-
series = "Communications in Computer and Information Science",
-
volume = "2828",
-
pages = "311--332",
-
publisher = "Springer",
-
note = "Best Student Paper",
-
keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, Cartesian
Genetic Programming, Evolutionary Computation, Program
Synthesis",
-
timestamp = "Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:57:53 +0200",
-
biburl = "
https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ijcci/CuiTCLWH25.bib",
-
bibsource = "dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org",
-
URL = "
https://www.insticc.org/node/TechnicalProgram/ijcci/2025/presentationDetails/137465",
-
DOI = "
10.1007/978-3-032-15635-8_20",
-
abstract = "Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) is a graph-based
evolutionary representation in which candidate
solutions are encoded as directed acyclic grid of
computational nodes. In standard CGP, only the output
of the full graph is considered for fitness evaluation,
although all intermediary (active) node outputs are
computed during execution. We introduce Iterative
Subgraph Assessment CGP (ISA-CGP), a straightforward
extension that treats every active active node output
as a potential solution: during each individual
evaluation, all subgraph outputs are assessed alongside
the full graph, and the best-performing expression is
selected. Favourably, in Symbolic Regression (SR)
fitness measurements are usually inexpensive. To
validate ISA-CGP, we conduct experiments on eight
benchmark problems drawn from the Feynman symbolic
regression suite, comparing convergence speed, final
model error, and computational effort against standard
CGP. Experimental results on the eight Feynman problems
demonstrate that ISA-CGP converges more rapidly and
attains superior fitness values in most cases.
Furthermore, ISA-CGP creates smaller solution programs,
indicating less bloated phenotypes which saves
computational efforts. These findings suggest that
ISA-CGP offers a simple yet effective enhancement to
CGP, achieving faster search and better solutions with
minimal overhead.",
- }
Genetic Programming entries for
Henning Cui
Camilo De La Torre
Sylvain Cussat-Blanc
Herve Luga
Dennis G Wilson
Joerg Haehner
Citations