Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.7852

- @InProceedings{First:2020:OOPSLA,
- author = "Emily First and Yuriy Brun and Arjun Guha",
- title = "{TacTok}: Semantics-Aware Proof Synthesis",
- booktitle = "Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (PACMPL) Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA) issue",
- year = "2020",
- pages = "Article No. 231",
- publisher = "ACM",
- keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, Formal software verification, Coq, proof script synthesis, automated proofscript synthesis",
- URL = "https://people.cs.umass.edu/~brun/pubs/pubs/First20oopsla.pdf",
- URL = "https://doi.org/10.1145/3428299",
- DOI = "doi:10.1145/3428299",
- video_url = "https://dl.acm.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1145%2F3428299&file=oopsla20main-p664-p-video.mp4",
- video_url = "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqkQ6KQmQCI",
- code_url = "https://zenodo.org/record/4088897#.ZAMETdbLdrk",
- size = "31 pages",
- abstract = "Formally verifying software correctness is a highly manual process. However, because verification proof scripts often share structure, it is possible to learn from existing proof scripts to fully automate some formal verification. The goal of this paper is to improve proof script synthesis and enable fully automating more verification. Interactive theorem provers, such as the Coq proof assistant, allow programmers to write partial proof scripts, observe the semantics of the proof state thus far, and then attempt more progress. Knowing the proof state semantics is a significant aid. Recent research has shown that the proof state can help predict the next step. In this paper, we present TacTok, the first technique that attempts to fully automate proof script synthesis by modeling proof scripts using both the partial proof script written thus far and the semantics of the proof state. Thus, TacTok more completely models the information the programmer has access to when writing proof scripts manually. We evaluate TacTok on a benchmark of 26 software projects in Coq, consisting of over 10 thousand theorems. We compare our approach to five tools. Two prior techniques, CoqHammer, the state-of-the-art proof synthesis technique, and ASTactic, a proof script synthesis technique that models proof state. And three new proof script synthesis technique we create ourselves, SeqOnly, which models only the partial proof script and the initial theorem being proven, and WeightedRandom and WeightedGreedy, which use metaheuristic search biased by frequencies of proof tactics in existing, successful proof scripts. We find that TacTok outperforms WeightedRandom and WeightedGreedy, and is complementary to CoqHammer and ASTactic: for 24 out of the 26 projects, TacTok can synthesize proof scripts for some theorems the prior tools cannot. Together with TacTok, 11.5percent more theorems can be proven automatically than by CoqHammer alone, and 20.0percent than by ASTactic alone. Compared to a combination of CoqHammer and ASTactic, TacTok can prove an additional 3.6percent more theorems, proving 115 theorems no tool could previously prove. Overall, our experiments provide evidence that partial proof script and proof state semantics, together, provide useful information for proof script modeling, and that metaheuristic search is a promising direction for proof script synthesis. TacTok is open-source and we make public all our data and a replication package of our experiments.",
- }

Genetic Programming entries for Emily First Yuriy Brun Arjun Guha