abstract = "Constitutional AI has focused on single-model
alignment using fixed principles. However, multiagent
systems create novel alignment challenges through
emergent social dynamics. We present Constitutional
Evolution, a framework for automatically discovering
behavioral norms in multi-agent LLM systems. Using a
grid-world simulation with survival pressure, we study
the tension between individual and collective welfare,
quantified via a Societal Stability Score S [0,1] that
combines productivity, survival, and conflict metrics.
Adversarial constitutions lead to societal collapse (S
= 0), while vague prosocial principles (be helpful,
harmless, honest) produce inconsistent coordination (S
= 0.249). Even constitutions designed by Claude 4.5
Opus with explicit knowledge of the objective achieve
only moderate performance (S = 0.332). Using LLM-driven
genetic programming with multi-island evolution, we
evolve constitutions maximizing social welfare without
explicit guidance toward cooperation. The evolved
constitution C∗ achieves S = 0.556 pm 0.008 (123
percent higher than human-designed baselines, N = 10),
eliminates conflict, and discovers that minimizing
communication (0.9 percent vs 62.2 percent social
actions) outperforms verbose coordination. Our
interpretable rules demonstrate that cooperative norms
can be discovered rather than prescribed",
notes = "'Figure 3: Multi-island evolutionary architecture.
Three populations evolve in parallel; top performers
migrate every 5 iterations'