- author = "Robert Plotkin",
- title = "Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform",
- journal = "UCLA Journal of Law and Technology,",
- year = "2003",
- volume = "7",
- number = "2",
- month = "Fall",
- keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, Law, patent, intellectual property, software",
-
URL = "
http://www.lawtechjournal.com/articles/2003/07_040127_plotkin.pdf",
-
URL = "
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=503822",
- size = "100 pages",
- abstract = "Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented. In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their logical structure. As a result, computer programmers need not engage in physical structural design, which historically has been necessary to invent electromechanical devices. This feature of software development violates the assumptions of patent law, which generally requires that electromechanical inventions be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of their physical structure. Patent law should allow software to be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of its logical structure to produce a better fit between patent law and software.",
-
notes = "Boston University - School of Law
Warning April 2016 http://www.lawtechjournal.com covered in spam
https://law.ucla.edu/student-life/law-reviews-and-journals/journal-of-law-and-technology/",
