Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8051
We know from experience that computers need careful guidance to create even the simplest musical sounds; but the potential of computers has inspired many composers to use them as tools or even as active partners. Computers excel at repetition and numeric calculation--which is not surprising, as computer programs consist fundamentally of variable assignments and loops. It is not a simple matter to construct music from these building blocks. The formal constructs of programming languages do not translate naturally into musical syntax, and obtaining aural complexity from a computer is always a challenge. Yet composers persist with this compelling notion: we know computers can work tirelessly on intricate problems, so we can imagine them creating a new kind of music--perhaps one not fully ruled by human logic. We may not understand the results; nonetheless we are curious. The paper is in four parts, which are progressively less technical. Part 1 explains why artificial evolution should be a useful technique for automatic music composition. It explains why frames of digital audio are generated rather than musical notes or phrases; an overview of genetic programming is followed by test examples. Part 2 applies the technique to create musical sounds. Part 3 introduces methods a composer might follow to obtain musical variety. Part 4 describes two musical compositions created by the author, Suite for Proteins and Passacaglia Polymer C3 . An Appendix describes the C++ implementation. Audio and code examples are included on two CDs.",
https://www.princeton.edu/.../List-of-Doctorates-and-Dissertation-Titles-most-recent.doc Perry R. Cook
OCLC Number: 54361714
UMI Microform 3110252 Oct 2016 Proquest URL already broken but it is still on the web pages, use search",
Genetic Programming entries for Peter Velikonja