Created by W.Langdon from gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8051
Experimental Design:
Preoperative MR images (T2-weighted and T1-postcontrast sequences) of 1,162 renal lesions definitely diagnosed on pathology or imaging in a multicenter cohort were divided into training, validation, and test sets (70:20:10 split). An ensemble model based on ResNet was built combining clinical variables and T1C and T2WI MR images using a bagging classifier to predict renal tumor pathology. Final model performance was compared with expert interpretation and the most optimized radiomics model.
Results:
Among the 1,162 renal lesions, 655 were malignant and 507 were benign. Compared with a baseline zero rule algorithm, the ensemble deep learning model had a statistically significant higher test accuracy (0.70 vs. 0.56, P = 0.004). Compared with all experts averaged, the ensemble deep learning model had higher test accuracy (0.70 vs. 0.60, P = 0.053), sensitivity (0.92 vs. 0.80, P = 0.017), and specificity (0.41 vs. 0.35, P = 0.450). Compared with the radiomics model, the ensemble deep learning model had higher test accuracy (0.70 vs. 0.62, P = 0.081), sensitivity (0.92 vs. 0.79, P = 0.012), and specificity (0.41 vs. 0.39, P = 0.770).
Conclusions:
Deep learning can noninvasively distinguish benign renal tumors from RCC using conventional MR imaging in a multi-institutional dataset with good accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity comparable with experts and radiomics.",
'This hand-optimised pipe line out performed the TPOT pipeline'
overfitting (training ROC 0.73--0.99 => test 0.43--0.73)?
Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).",
Genetic Programming entries for Ianto Lin Xi Yijun Zhao Robin Wang Marcello Chang Subhanik Purkayastha Ken Chang Raymond Y Huang Alvin C Silva Martin Vallieres Peiman Habibollahi Yong Fan Beiji Zou Terence P Gade Paul J Zhang Michael C Soulen Zishu Zhang Harrison X Bai S William Stavropoulos