Dynamic Modelling Using Genetic Programming
Created by W.Langdon from
gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8051
- @PhdThesis{hinchliffe:thesis,
-
author = "Mark P. Hinchliffe",
-
title = "Dynamic Modelling Using Genetic Programming",
-
school = "School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials,
University of Newcastle upon Tyne",
-
year = "2001",
-
address = "UK",
-
month = sep,
-
keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, MOGA, MOGP,
SOGP",
-
URL = "http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/W.Langdon/ftp/papers/hinchliffe:Thesis.pdf",
-
broken = "http://www.ncl.ac.uk/ceam/postgrad/pg-theses.htm",
-
URL = "http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=5&uin=uk.bl.ethos.391407",
-
size = "205 pages",
-
abstract = "Genetic programming (GP) is an evolutionary algorithm
that attempts to evolve solutions to a problem by using
concepts taken from the naturally occurring
evolutionary process. This thesis introduces the
concepts of GP model development by applying the
technique to steady-state model evolution. A variation
of the algorithm known as the multiple basis function
GP (MBF-GP) algorithm is described and its performance
compared with the standard algorithm. Results show that
the MBF-GP algorithm requires significantly less
computational effort to evolve models of comparable
accuracy to the standard algorithm. The steady-state
algorithm is then modified to enable the evolution of
dynamic process models. Three case studies are used to
demonstrate algorithm performance and show how the
MBF-GP algorithm produces performance benefits similar
to those observed in the steady-state modelling work. A
comparison with neural networks reveals that GP is able
to match the accuracy of the network predictions but is
more expensive computationally. However, a significant
advantage of the GP algorithm is that it can
automatically evolve the time history of model terms
required to account for process characteristics such as
the system time delay.
The model development process is not simply a case of
reducing the error between the predicted and actual
process output. The parallel nature of GP means that it
is ideally suited to solving multi-objective problems.
The MBF-GP algorithm is modified to incorporate a
Pareto based ranking scheme that allows models to be
compared using multiple performance criteria. The
ranking scheme allows preference information in the
form of goals and priorities to be specified in order
to guide the search towards the desired region of the
search space. Two case studies are used to demonstrate
the performance of this technique. The first example
uses the multi-objective algorithm to improve the
parsimony of the evolved model structures. The second
example demonstrates how a set residual correlation
tests can be combined and used as an additional
performance measure. In each case, the multi-objective
algorithm performs significantly better than the single
objective version. In addition, the inclusion of
preference information overcomes some of the
difficulties associated with conventional Pareto
ranking and produces a greater number of acceptable
solutions.",
-
notes = "{"}the results do not provide sufficient evidence to
suggest that GP will become as widely used as neural
network modelling techniques.{"} page
160.
uk.bl.ethos.391407",
- }
Genetic Programming entries for
Mark P Hinchliffe
Citations