Symbolic regression and differentiable fits in beyond the standard model physics
Created by W.Langdon from
gp-bibliography.bib Revision:1.8880
- @Article{AbdusSalam:2026:RSTA,
-
author = "Shehu AbdusSalam and Steven Abel and
Deaglan Bartlett and Miguel {Crispim Romao}",
-
title = "Symbolic regression and differentiable fits in beyond
the standard model physics",
-
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A:
Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences",
-
year = "2026",
-
volume = "384",
-
number = "2317",
-
pages = "20240593",
-
month = "9 " # apr,
-
keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming, Operon,
Python, PyOperon, supersymmetry, beyond standard model,
symbolic regression, computational physics, high energy
physics, particle physics, ANN",
-
ISSN = "1364-503X",
-
URL = "
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0593",
-
URL = "
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rsta/article-pdf/doi/10.1098/rsta.2024.0593/6131808/rsta.2024.0593.pdf",
-
DOI = "
10.1098/rsta.2024.0593",
-
size = "15 pages",
-
abstract = "We demonstrate the efficacy of symbolic regression
(SR) to probe models of particle physics Beyond the
Standard Model (BSM), by considering the so-called
Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
(CMSSM). Like many incarnations of BSM physics this
model has a number (four) of arbitrary parameters,
which determine the experimental signals, and
cosmological observables such as the dark matter relic
density. We show that analysis of the phenomenology can
be greatly accelerated by using symbolic expressions
derived for the observables in terms of the input
parameters. Here we focus on the Higgs mass, the cold
dark matter relic density and the contribution to the
anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. We find that SR
can produce remarkably accurate expressions. Using them
we make global fits to derive the posterior probability
densities of the CMSSM input parameters which are in
good agreement with those performed using conventional
methods. Moreover, we demonstrate a major advantage of
SR, which is the ability to make fits using
differentiable methods rather than sampling methods. We
also compare the method with neural network (NN)
regression. SR produces more globally robust results,
while NNs require data that is focused on the promising
regions in order to be equally performant.",
-
notes = "part of the discussion meeting issue Symbolic
regression in the physical sciences
\cite{Bartlett:2026:RSTAintro}.
Department of Physics, Shahid Beheshti University,
Tehran, Iran",
- }
Genetic Programming entries for
Shehu AbdusSalam
Steven Abel
Deaglan J Bartlett
Miguel Crispim Romao
Citations