- author = "Leonardo Vanneschi and Antonella Farinaccio and Giancarlo Mauri and Mauro Antoniotti and Paolo Provero and Mario Giacobini",
- title = "A comparison of machine learning techniques for survival prediction in breast cancer",
- journal = "BioData Mining",
- year = "2011",
- volume = "4",
- number = "12",
- keywords = "genetic algorithms, genetic programming",
-
DOI = "
doi:10.1186/1756-0381-4-12",
- size = "13 pages",
-
abstract = "Background
The ability to accurately classify cancer patients into risk classes, i.e. to predict the outcome of the pathology on an individual basis, is a key ingredient in making therapeutic decisions. In recent years gene expression data have been successfully used to complement the clinical and histological criteria traditionally used in such prediction. Many 'gene expression signatures' have been developed, i.e. sets of genes whose expression values in a tumour can be used to predict the outcome of the pathology. Here we investigate the use of several machine learning techniques to classify breast cancer patients using one of such signatures, the well established 70-gene signature. Results
We show that Genetic Programming performs significantly better than Support Vector Machines, Multilayered Perceptrons and Random Forests in classifying patients from the NKI breast cancer data set, and comparably to the scoring-based method originally proposed by the authors of the 70-gene signature. Furthermore, Genetic Programming is able to perform an automatic feature selection.
Conclusions
Since the performance of Genetic Programming is likely to be improvable compared to the out-of-the-box approach used here, and given the biological insight potentially provided by the Genetic Programming solutions, we conclude that Genetic Programming methods are worth further investigation as a tool for cancer patient classification based on gene expression data.",
